Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update request-resolvers.md #619

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

alexanderilyin
Copy link
Contributor

@alexanderilyin alexanderilyin commented Oct 20, 2024

Typo fix in code snippet.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated documentation for request resolvers to clarify custom validation and transformations.
    • Enhanced examples for the Resolve method, focusing on error handling and the Location field.
    • Expanded section on resolver errors, including custom HTTP status codes and the importance of exhaustive errors.
    • Added an example for implementation checks to ensure struct compliance with specific interfaces.

Typo fix in code snippet.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The documentation for request resolvers in Go has been updated to enhance clarity regarding custom validation and transformations for request inputs. Key changes include a refined example of the Resolve method with improved error handling, guidance against saving context objects, and an expanded section on custom HTTP status codes for resolvers. Additionally, a new example for checking interface implementation has been added to support code integrity.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/docs/features/request-resolvers.md Updated documentation to clarify functionality, usage of resolvers, error handling, and custom status codes. Enhanced examples and added a new implementation check example.

Suggested reviewers

  • danielgtaylor

Poem

In the land of code where bunnies hop,
Resolvers now shine, they never stop!
With clearer paths and errors in line,
Our docs are now better, oh how they shine!
Hopping with joy, we celebrate this feat,
For in every change, our code feels sweet! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.88%. Comparing base (c6191e3) to head (328d458).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #619   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.88%   92.88%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines        4834     4834           
=======================================
  Hits         4490     4490           
  Misses        299      299           
  Partials       45       45           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs/docs/features/request-resolvers.md (2)

50-50: Approve the addition of the Location field with a minor formatting suggestion.

The addition of the Location field in the huma.ErrorDetail struct is a good improvement. It enhances the error information by specifying where the error occurred, which aligns well with the documentation's emphasis on providing exhaustive and informative errors.

Consider replacing the hard tab with spaces to maintain consistent formatting throughout the document:

-		Location: prefix.With("foo"),
+        Location: prefix.With("foo"),
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

50-50: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


Expanded Section on Custom HTTP Status Codes is Missing

  • The documentation does not include the expanded section on custom HTTP status codes for resolvers.
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-114: Verify implementation of described changes and offer assistance.

The AI summary indicates several improvements to the documentation, including:

  1. Refined example of the Resolve method with improved error handling
  2. Guidance against saving context objects
  3. Expanded section on custom HTTP status codes for resolvers
  4. New example for checking interface implementation

While the change we can see directly improves the error handling example, it would be beneficial to verify that all the other described improvements have been implemented correctly throughout the document.

To assist in verifying these changes, you can run the following script:

If any of these changes are not fully implemented or if you need assistance in further improving the documentation, please let me know, and I'd be happy to help.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of described changes in the documentation.

# Test 1: Check for improved error handling example
echo "Checking for improved error handling example:"
rg -A 5 "func \(m \*MyInput\) Resolve\(ctx huma\.Context" docs/docs/features/request-resolvers.md

# Test 2: Check for guidance against saving context objects
echo "Checking for guidance against saving context objects:"
rg "do not save the context object" docs/docs/features/request-resolvers.md

# Test 3: Check for expanded section on custom HTTP status codes
echo "Checking for expanded section on custom HTTP status codes:"
rg -A 5 "huma\.StatusError interface" docs/docs/features/request-resolvers.md

# Test 4: Check for new example of interface implementation check
echo "Checking for new example of interface implementation check:"
rg -A 3 "var _ huma\.Resolver = \(\*MyInput\)\(nil\)" docs/docs/features/request-resolvers.md

Length of output: 1870

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

48-48: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


49-49: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


50-50: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


51-51: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)


52-52: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6191e3 and 328d458.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/docs/features/request-resolvers.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
docs/docs/features/request-resolvers.md

50-50: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

Copy link
Owner

@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! 👍

@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor merged commit ee574f8 into danielgtaylor:main Oct 22, 2024
5 checks passed
@alexanderilyin
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm having really good time using the library.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants