Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#1] updated gradoop version #2

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

taucontrib
Copy link

  • Updated the Gradoop version to 0.5.1
  • Changed all objects of type Vertex | Edge | GraphHead to EPGMVertex | EPGMEdge | EPGMGraphHead
  • All objects of type VertexFactory belong to VertexFactory<EPGMVertex> now (same with EdgeFactory and GraphHeadFactory)
  • all occurence of the GradoopFlinkConfig.getVertexFactory() been changed to GradoopFlinkConfig.getLogicalGraphFactory().getVertexFactory() or GradoopFlinkConfig.getGraphCollectionFactory.getVertexFactory() (same withEdges and GraphHeads
  • the transformation from objects of type Date into type Long in the ComplaintHandling class in line 196 e.g. is now done via the PropertyValue.getDate().getLong(ChronoField.ERA) method call
  • The AbstractRunner class, super class for the SyntheticDataGenerator example is not included in the examples of Gradoop 0.5.1 but in the latest Benchmark version. I don´t wanted to include the Benchmark repo as a dependency so i added the AbstractRunner class in the Gradoop-Generator project
  • The whole CategoryCharacteristicsSubgraphTest is (still?) not working and gets ignored. HasLabel<>() is an aggregate function in the new Gradoop version and can´t be used as a filter function anymore
  • Changed the copyright of the license headers of each class to 2019
  • added a .github.workflows directory for the maven.yml file identicall to the build in Gradoop/Gradoop-Capf etc
  • someone has to check/update the pom.xml script

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant