Clarify that the DID Method of a witness DID and diffentiating the DID Log Entry proofs #123
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…D Log Entry proofs Signed-off-by: Stephen Curran <swcurran@gmail.com>
spec/specification.md
Outdated
| @@ -895,6 +903,12 @@ An overview of the [[ref: witness]] mechanism is as follows: | |||
| - Over time, the list of [[ref: witnesses]] may evolve, with each change being | |||
| approved by the declared list of [[ref: witnesses]] from **before** such a | |||
| change. | |||
| - The DID of the witnesses **SHOULD** be `did:tdw` DIDs to prevent the need for | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shouldn't this be a MUST?
Signed-off-by: Stephen Curran <swcurran@gmail.com>
|
@brianorwhatever -- updated the DID, changing both SHOULDs to MUSTs and cleaned up the infinite loop wording. I think the second MUST is also needed as a resolver that gets into an infinite loop isn't very useful. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addresses #114 and clarifies that a witness DID SHOULD be a did:tdw and why. Also mentions the possiblity of mutual witnesses causing an infinite loop.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Curran swcurran@gmail.com