Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exam Simulator Generator (based on the markdown files) #204

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

restarac
Copy link

@restarac restarac commented Jul 6, 2021

This will create a simple program that choose random questions based in what is written on the markdown files.
This will only generate the questions and give a notion where are the possible answer to the question among the markdown files.

Here are the example of the command line to run and create a simulation file:

echo 26 | /usr/bin/python3.8 ./exam-simulator.py > exam-$(date +"%Y-%m-%d").txt

The exam will be generate based on the avaiable questions and the percentage weights on the exam.

@restarac restarac changed the title Create Exam Simulator Generator (based on the markdown files) Exam Simulator Generator (based on the markdown files) Jul 6, 2021
@restarac restarac marked this pull request as ready for review July 6, 2021 20:26
@dgkanatsios
Copy link
Owner

Awesome! Thank you for that! Want to add some instructions on the Readme?

@ChristopherLenz
Copy link

I don't think this is really useful. Lots of questions build upon previous questions and are not resolvable alone.

some examples:

  • Check how the deployment rollout is going
  • Convert the ClusterIP to NodePort for the same service and find the NodePort port. Hit service using Node's IP. Delete the service and the pod at the end.
  • Display its values
  • Delete the job
  • Create the pod that was just described using YAML
  • Remove these pods to have a clean state in your cluster
  • ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants