Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce Typed RPC Specification #53

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mbarbin
Copy link
Contributor

@mbarbin mbarbin commented Jan 8, 2024

This PR introduces a new typed specification for RPCs, extracted from PR #48 as an independent change. This allows for the independent development of other components (eio, lwt, async, protoc & protoc_plugin).

Initial documentation has been added to the new interface as a starting point, which can be refined as we progress with the integration of other components.

The goal is to merge this PR first to facilitate the concurrent development of the remaining components.

This is extracted from dialohq#48 as a standalone change which should allow
starting building the other pieces (eio, lwt, async, protoc &
protoc_plugin) independently.
@mbarbin mbarbin marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2024 19:44
@mbarbin mbarbin mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2024
1 task
@mbarbin mbarbin marked this pull request as draft April 16, 2024 14:50
@mbarbin
Copy link
Contributor Author

mbarbin commented Apr 16, 2024

ℹ️ This PR is intended to be closed, as its changes are likely to be subsumed by PR #56 and any subsequent related PRs.

@mbarbin
Copy link
Contributor Author

mbarbin commented Nov 18, 2024

Hi @wokalski. I hope all is well! With arpaca around the corner, I thought it would be a reasonable time to close my stale PRs in this repo. Do you have objections to me going ahead and close them? Thanks a lot!

@wokalski
Copy link
Contributor

sure!

@wokalski wokalski closed this Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants