Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evidence Source: NFC Reader #380

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Evidence Source: NFC Reader #380

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

bettse
Copy link

@bettse bettse commented Nov 22, 2014

I've been working on software for an NFC reader off and on for a little over a year (https://github.com/bettse/janus) and the last time I was working on it, I began to realize that I was spending too much time trying to architect a platform for performing actions. When I picked up the project again, I started by looking for an application that already handled the 'output' (actions), so that I might add the reader as an 'input' (EvidenceSource). Although I'm not a regular user, I had played with ControlPlane in the past, so it came to mind. I saw the USBEvidenceSource and took it as evidence that supporting this USB device would be possible. I started porting my lower level device code into a plugin, and this PR is the result.

Since I'm not strongly familiar with the convention of the project, I'm guessing this will be far from in a state to actually merge. I welcome any feedback that may get it closer to such a state. I'm also aware that this also may be too esoteric to warrant inclusion in the mainline at all.

In terms of testing, this particular NFC reader is moderately difficult to acquire since the product line had been discontinued a year or two before company who produced it went out of business. I have an extra that I can ship if there is interest.

A consumer grade NFC reader from a defunct French company, Violet,
who also made the Nabaztag and Karotz, early attempts at
Internet of Things appliances.
@ssbarnea
Copy link

Probably it would worth closing this one as it seems abandoned. If needed it could be revived anyway.

@bettse
Copy link
Author

bettse commented Mar 23, 2017

I never got any feedback on it, but I'm more than happy to respond to any feedback and rebase to bring it up to date.

@deed02392
Copy link

@dustinrue Please review these PRs or assign another contributor the necessary permissions to do so if you are too busy?

@dustinrue
Copy link
Owner

@deed02392 There are no other trusted contributors on the project at this time

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants