add optional-dependencies julia

[yasirroni]

No description provided.

[vogt31337]

@yasirroni Thank you for your interest in this work. Could you provide more detail on why we should add this dependency? Are you actively using the julia parts of this project?

[yasirroni]

You can't say that I'm actively used. I just writing a benchmark and pandapower happen to be one of it. I will bench both manual approach accessing PowerMoodels and PowerModels via pandapower.

I'm only interested to fix bug in #2409 since PGLib will be one of the bench and I don't want pandapower to be not compatible.

[vogt31337]

@yasirroni that is really interesting, thanks for helping fix this bug. But I don't understand why pandapower needs to be directly depending on julia? Maybe it would be better to introduce an OPF field for the packages, so that these packages get installed when, a user explicitly wants to do some OPF related research.

[yasirroni]

@yasirroni that is really interesting, thanks for helping fix this bug. But I don't understand why pandapower needs to be directly depending on julia? Maybe it would be better to introduce an OPF field for the packages, so that these packages get installed when, a user explicitly wants to do some OPF related research.

That is already in extras (optional) dependency.