Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement: Vehicle Model generator as module integration #27

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

mml5bg
Copy link
Contributor

@mml5bg mml5bg commented Jul 13, 2023

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 13, 2023

Test Results

0 tests   - 10   0 ✔️  - 10   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites  -   1   0 💤 ±  0 
0 files    -   1   0 ±  0 

Results for commit be7403e. ± Comparison against base commit 6c0cd98.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@kse3hi
Copy link
Contributor

kse3hi commented Jul 31, 2023

Hi @mml5bg , if there is no intention to merge this PR, please mark it as draft or delete it.

@@ -104,7 +94,7 @@ def install_model_if_required(language: str, model_path: str) -> None:
model_path (str): The path where the generated model is stored.
"""
if language == "python":
subprocess.check_call([sys.executable, "-m", "pip", "install", model_path])
subprocess.check_call(["sys.executable", "-m", "pip", "install", model_path])
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is sys.executable quoted now? That way its just a string literal and not a variable which is being resolved. I doubt this change is runnable. Have you tested it?

@MP91
Copy link
Contributor

MP91 commented Aug 21, 2023

@mml5bg Can we close this one or is it still needed?

@mml5bg mml5bg closed this Aug 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants