-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Obs AI Assistant] Serverless API integration tests #192219
Conversation
🤖 GitHub commentsExpand to view the GitHub comments
Just comment with:
|
/ci |
@@ -104,7 +104,8 @@ export type StreamingChatResponseEvent = | |||
| ConversationUpdateEvent | |||
| MessageAddEvent | |||
| ChatCompletionErrorEvent | |||
| TokenCountEvent; | |||
| TokenCountEvent | |||
| BufferFlushEvent; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BufferFlushEvent
can be returned as a streaming chat response event in cloud
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes but it's intentionally not here to not overcomplicate the StreamingChatResponseEvent
type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only added it due to causing a type error in complete.spec.ts due to filtering out BufferFlushEvent
s appearing in the data. Is it okay to leave it?
.filter(Boolean) | ||
.map((line) => JSON.parse(line) as StreamingChatResponseEvent) | ||
// Filter BufferFlush events that appear if isCloudEnabled is true which is the case in serverless tests | ||
.filter((event) => event.type !== StreamingChatResponseEventType.BufferFlush) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added filtering out bufferFlush events so as not to break test below that checks for the 4th event which gets pushed down in serverless from the BufferFlush event.
export default function ApiTest({ getService }: FtrProviderContext) { | ||
const supertest = getService('supertest'); | ||
const log = getService('log'); | ||
const synthtrace = getService('synthtrace'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since this was added as a common service already, i've used it and not added a local one. we should extend it to uninstall the apm package similar to stateful, as a cleanup function or via the kibana client as we have in stateful.
…into serverless-tests
💔 All backports failed
Manual backportTo create the backport manually run:
Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
Tests for serverless - copies over and modifies all tests from stateful to work in serverless. ~~deployment agnostic tests do not yet support enterprise license for stateful, so are tests don't yet qualify as being deployment agnostic~~. Given how difficult it is to see differences from the stateful tests, I've added PR comments where I've changed something that might be of interest. - changes to `createObservabilityAIAssistantApiClient` to use supertest without basic auth and accept headers for serverless and use roles - removes creating persisted users when tests start and [use roles](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/x-pack/test_serverless/README.md#roles-based-testing) within tests. its not possible to create custom users with the serverless test framework at the moment. See elastic#192711 Skipped tests - knowledge base tests elastic#192886 - any test suite that uses the LLM proxy has been skipped on MKI elastic#192751 - all tests that depend on the config.modelId skipped in MKI elastic#192757 TODO: - [x] move over remaining tests - [x] test in MKI environment before merging - [x] create issues for skipped tests - [ ] this will not run on MKI (after merging) unless we ping the appex-qa team to add it to the pipeline. this is due to creating a separate config. ask appex-qa team to add our config. Followup / related issues to be tracked in a newly created issue: - [ ] elastic#192757 - [ ] elastic#192886 - [ ] elastic#192751 - [ ] elastic#192701 - [ ] elastic#192497 - [ ] elastic#192711 - [ ] elastic#192718 - [ ] serverless functional tests - [ ] inquire with ml-ui-team to have the ability to delete system indices which we do after uninstalling tiny elser with .ml indices
Tests for serverless - copies over and modifies all tests from stateful to work in serverless. ~~deployment agnostic tests do not yet support enterprise license for stateful, so are tests don't yet qualify as being deployment agnostic~~. Given how difficult it is to see differences from the stateful tests, I've added PR comments where I've changed something that might be of interest. - changes to `createObservabilityAIAssistantApiClient` to use supertest without basic auth and accept headers for serverless and use roles - removes creating persisted users when tests start and [use roles](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/x-pack/test_serverless/README.md#roles-based-testing) within tests. its not possible to create custom users with the serverless test framework at the moment. See elastic#192711 Skipped tests - knowledge base tests elastic#192886 - any test suite that uses the LLM proxy has been skipped on MKI elastic#192751 - all tests that depend on the config.modelId skipped in MKI elastic#192757 TODO: - [x] move over remaining tests - [x] test in MKI environment before merging - [x] create issues for skipped tests - [ ] this will not run on MKI (after merging) unless we ping the appex-qa team to add it to the pipeline. this is due to creating a separate config. ask appex-qa team to add our config. Followup / related issues to be tracked in a newly created issue: - [ ] elastic#192757 - [ ] elastic#192886 - [ ] elastic#192751 - [ ] elastic#192701 - [ ] elastic#192497 - [ ] elastic#192711 - [ ] elastic#192718 - [ ] serverless functional tests - [ ] inquire with ml-ui-team to have the ability to delete system indices which we do after uninstalling tiny elser with .ml indices
Tests for serverless - copies over and modifies all tests from stateful to work in serverless. ~~deployment agnostic tests do not yet support enterprise license for stateful, so are tests don't yet qualify as being deployment agnostic~~. Given how difficult it is to see differences from the stateful tests, I've added PR comments where I've changed something that might be of interest. - changes to `createObservabilityAIAssistantApiClient` to use supertest without basic auth and accept headers for serverless and use roles - removes creating persisted users when tests start and [use roles](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/x-pack/test_serverless/README.md#roles-based-testing) within tests. its not possible to create custom users with the serverless test framework at the moment. See elastic#192711 Skipped tests - knowledge base tests elastic#192886 - any test suite that uses the LLM proxy has been skipped on MKI elastic#192751 - all tests that depend on the config.modelId skipped in MKI elastic#192757 TODO: - [x] move over remaining tests - [x] test in MKI environment before merging - [x] create issues for skipped tests - [ ] this will not run on MKI (after merging) unless we ping the appex-qa team to add it to the pipeline. this is due to creating a separate config. ask appex-qa team to add our config. Followup / related issues to be tracked in a newly created issue: - [ ] elastic#192757 - [ ] elastic#192886 - [ ] elastic#192751 - [ ] elastic#192701 - [ ] elastic#192497 - [ ] elastic#192711 - [ ] elastic#192718 - [ ] serverless functional tests - [ ] inquire with ml-ui-team to have the ability to delete system indices which we do after uninstalling tiny elser with .ml indices
…194582) Tests for serverless - copies over and modifies all tests from stateful to work in serverless. ~~deployment agnostic tests do not yet support enterprise license for stateful, so are tests don't yet qualify as being deployment agnostic~~. Given how difficult it is to see differences from the stateful tests, I've added PR comments where I've changed something that might be of interest. - changes to `createObservabilityAIAssistantApiClient` to use supertest without basic auth and accept headers for serverless and use roles - removes creating persisted users when tests start and [use roles](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/x-pack/test_serverless/README.md#roles-based-testing) within tests. its not possible to create custom users with the serverless test framework at the moment. See #192711 Skipped tests - knowledge base tests #192886 - any test suite that uses the LLM proxy has been skipped on MKI #192751 - all tests that depend on the config.modelId skipped in MKI #192757 TODO: - [x] move over remaining tests - [x] test in MKI environment before merging - [x] create issues for skipped tests - [ ] this will not run on MKI (after merging) unless we ping the appex-qa team to add it to the pipeline. this is due to creating a separate config. ask appex-qa team to add our config. Followup / related issues to be tracked in a newly created issue: - [ ] #192757 - [ ] #192886 - [ ] #192751 - [ ] #192701 - [ ] #192497 - [ ] #192711 - [ ] #192718 - [ ] serverless functional tests - [ ] inquire with ml-ui-team to have the ability to delete system indices which we do after uninstalling tiny elser with .ml indices ## Summary Summarize your PR. If it involves visual changes include a screenshot or gif. ### Checklist Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR. - [ ] Any text added follows [EUI's writing guidelines](https://elastic.github.io/eui/#/guidelines/writing), uses sentence case text and includes [i18n support](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/packages/kbn-i18n/README.md) - [ ] [Documentation](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-documentation.html) was added for features that require explanation or tutorials - [ ] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios - [ ] [Flaky Test Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was used on any tests changed - [ ] Any UI touched in this PR is usable by keyboard only (learn more about [keyboard accessibility](https://webaim.org/techniques/keyboard/)) - [ ] Any UI touched in this PR does not create any new axe failures (run axe in browser: [FF](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/axe-devtools/), [Chrome](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe-web-accessibility-tes/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US)) - [ ] If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be allowlisted in the cloud and added to the [docker list](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/src/dev/build/tasks/os_packages/docker_generator/resources/base/bin/kibana-docker) - [ ] This renders correctly on smaller devices using a responsive layout. (You can test this [in your browser](https://www.browserstack.com/guide/responsive-testing-on-local-server)) - [ ] This was checked for [cross-browser compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers) ### Risk Matrix Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR. Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature release. When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples and how they may potentially impact the change: | Risk | Probability | Severity | Mitigation/Notes | |---------------------------|-------------|----------|-------------------------| | Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space. | Low | High | Integration tests will verify that all features are still supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between spaces. | | Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. | High | Low | Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing procedure. | | Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are disabled. | Medium | High | Unit tests will verify that any feature flag or plugin combination still results in our service operational. | | [See more potential risk examples](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/main/RISK_MATRIX.mdx) | ### For maintainers - [ ] This was checked for breaking API changes and was [labeled appropriately](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/contributing.html#kibana-release-notes-process)
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
13 similar comments
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
Friendly reminder: Looks like this PR hasn’t been backported yet. |
backported in #194582 |
Tests for serverless
deployment agnostic tests do not yet support enterprise license for stateful, so are tests don't yet qualify as being deployment agnostic. Given how difficult it is to see differences from the stateful tests, I've added PR comments where I've changed something that might be of interest.createObservabilityAIAssistantApiClient
to use supertest without basic auth and accept headers for serverless and use rolesSkipped tests
TODO:
Followup / related issues to be tracked in a newly created issue: