[Fix bug] Task detail page crashes #3401
Conversation
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-main-info.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.46.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "next/core-web-vitals" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "next/core-web-vitals" was referenced from the config file in "/apps/web/.eslintrc.json". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve refactoring the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
CREDO23
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-main-info.tsx (2)
223-239: LGTM! The null checks fix the crash issue.The added early returns and proper null checks in both
unassignedMembersandassignedTaskMembersfunctions effectively prevent the crash when accessing undefined task members. This directly addresses the issue reported in #3394.Consider caching the
assignedIdscalculation to avoid duplicate work:const unassignedMembers = useMemo(() => { if (!task?.members) return memberList.filter((member) => member.employee?.isActive); - const assignedIds = task.members.map((item) => item.userId); + const assignedIds = useMemo(() => task.members.map((item) => item.userId), [task.members]); return memberList.filter( (member) => member.employee && !assignedIds.includes(member.employee.userId) && member.employee.isActive ); }, [memberList, task?.members]);
Line range hint
52-186: LGTM! Date handling logic is robust.The date validation and reset functionality is well-implemented with proper null handling. The validation ensures that start dates precede due dates, and the reset functionality correctly handles null values.
Consider adding type safety for the date parameters in handleResetDate:
type DateField = 'startDate' | 'dueDate'; const handleResetDate = useCallback( (date: DateField) => { // ... existing implementation }, [$startDate, $dueDate, task, updateTask] );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-main-info.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-main-info.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-386: Verify all potential crash points are addressed.
While the main crash issue with task members is fixed, let's ensure we've covered all potential crash scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
All potential crash points are properly handled with null checks
The code has comprehensive null-checking in place:
-
Task member access is properly guarded:
- Early returns with
if (!task?.members) - Optional chaining on all task member access
task?.members?.map - Null checks on nested properties
member.employee?.isActive
- Early returns with
-
Date handling is safely implemented:
- Fallback patterns using ternary operators
startDate ? x : task?.startDate ? y : z - Null-safe date transformations with optional chaining
- Safe date calculations with undefined checks
- Fallback patterns using ternary operators
-
Creator/assignee rendering has proper guards:
- Conditional rendering with
task?.creator && - Optional chaining on nested properties
creator?.firstName - Fallbacks with OR operator
|| ''
- Conditional rendering with
The code follows best practices for preventing null/undefined crashes and the original review comment's concern has been addressed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential null/undefined access patterns that could cause crashes
# Look for direct property access on potentially null objects
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' '\??\.' apps/web/components/pages/task
# Look for array operations without null checks
rg -g '*.{ts,tsx}' '\.map\(' apps/web/components/pages/task
# Look for task-related type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ITeamTask {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 73716
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify potential crash points by checking task-related interfaces and null checks
# 1. Find the task interface definition
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ITeamTask {
$$$
}'
# 2. Check for potential null/undefined access in task-main-info.tsx
rg -g 'task-main-info.tsx' '\?' apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-main-info.tsx
# 3. Look for array operations without null checks
rg -g 'task-main-info.tsx' '\.(map|filter|reduce|forEach|some|every)\(' apps/web/components/pages/task/details-section/blocks/task-main-info.tsx
Length of output: 4793
evereq
deleted the
3394-bug-task-details-page--app-crash-on-visiting-task-page
branch
Description
Fix #3394
Type of Change
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes