Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update build-linux-clang10-mini-tsan #13220

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

archang19
Copy link
Contributor

@archang19 archang19 commented Dec 17, 2024

Summary

I found this mismatch between the CI job title and the actual command ran incidentally while trying to work on #13213.

build-linux-clang10-mini-tsan was added in #7122 with clang-10.

In #10496 it was changed to use clang-13 but the name was not also updated. I do not know what the author's intent was, but given that build-linux-clang10-mini-tsan is right next tobuild-linux-clang10-ubsan and build-linux-clang10-asan, I think it is more likely we originally intended to use clang-10.

Test Plan

I think we need to wait for the next set of CI checks after this PR is merged, since I don't see my changes incorporated into this PR's build-linux-clang10-mini-tsan check.

@archang19 archang19 changed the title Update h.pub rule Update build-linux-clang10-mini-tsan Dec 18, 2024
@archang19 archang19 marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 19:40
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@archang19 has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@archang19 archang19 requested a review from pdillinger December 18, 2024 19:43
Copy link
Contributor

@hx235 hx235 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just remember to monitor any github CI failure after this lands :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants