You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ Then there is enough history to build upon, and the compression algorithm can re
Zstd has not yet reached "stable format" status. It doesn't guarantee yet that its current compression format will remain stable in future versions. During this period, it can still change to adapt new optimizations still being investigated. "Stable Format" is projected H1 2016, and will be tagged `v1.0`.
That being said, the library is now fairly robust, able to withstand hazards situations, including invalid inputs. It also features legacy support, so that documents compressed with current and previous version of zstd can still be decoded in the future.
Library reliability has been tested using [Fuzz Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzz_testing), with both [internal tools](programs/fuzzer.c) and [external ones](http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl). Therefore, Zstandard is not considered safe for testings, even within production environments.
Library reliability has been tested using [Fuzz Testing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuzz_testing), with both [internal tools](programs/fuzzer.c) and [external ones](http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl). Therefore, Zstandard is considered safe for testings, even within production environments.
