Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: release v0.0.5 #261

Draft
wants to merge 29 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

chore: release v0.0.5 #261

wants to merge 29 commits into from

Conversation

amhsirak
Copy link
Member

@amhsirak amhsirak commented Dec 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed volume mounts from the backend and frontend services in the Docker configuration to streamline the setup.
    • Minor adjustments made to the volumes section without changing its content.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 14, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The pull request involves modifications to the docker-compose.yml file, specifically focusing on volume mount configurations for the backend and frontend services. The changes remove several volume mounts that were previously used for hot reloading and code sharing, indicating a potential shift in the development or deployment approach for the application's containerized environment.

Changes

File Change Summary
docker-compose.yml Removed volume mounts for backend service:
- ./server:/app/server
- ./maxun-core:/app/maxun-core

Removed volume mounts for frontend service:
- ./:/app
- /app/node_modules

Suggested labels

Type: Enhancement

Poem

🐰 Docker's dance, a volume's retreat
Mounts stripped away, now lean and neat
No more hot reloads, no shared code's embrace
Containers stand simple, with minimalist grace
A rabbit's whisper: simplicity's art! 🐰


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@amhsirak amhsirak marked this pull request as draft December 14, 2024 22:44
@amhsirak amhsirak added the Type: New Release Releases for Maxun - Bug Fix, Feature, HotFix, etc. label Dec 14, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docker-compose.yml (2)

Line range hint 1-85: Version mismatch between PR and container images

The PR is for release v0.0.5, but the compose file references:

  • Backend image: v0.0.7
  • Frontend image: v0.0.3

This version mismatch needs clarification:

  1. Are these the correct image versions for this release?
  2. Should the versions be updated to match v0.0.5?
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 86-86: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)


86-86: Add newline at end of file

The file is missing a newline character at the end, which is a POSIX requirement.

Apply this fix:

  redis_data:
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 86-86: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b1b0d3 and 4469325.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docker-compose.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
docker-compose.yml

[error] 86-86: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
docker-compose.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-85: Verify the architectural changes from development to production setup

The removal of volume mounts (./server:/app/server, ./maxun-core:/app/maxun-core for backend and ./:/app, /app/node_modules for frontend) indicates a shift from a development setup with hot-reloading to a production-like environment using built images. This aligns with release practices but requires verification.

Run the following to verify the image versions and their contents:

✅ Verification successful

Architectural changes are appropriate for a production release

The removal of volume mounts is correct for a production setup as:

  1. The Dockerfiles show proper build processes for both frontend and backend
  2. Backend image (v0.0.7) includes all necessary production dependencies and Playwright setup
  3. Frontend image (v0.0.3) contains the built application code
  4. The docker-compose.yml correctly maintains essential volumes for data persistence (postgres_data, minio_data)
  5. Development-specific volume mounts are appropriately removed as they're not needed in production

The changes align with standard practices for transitioning from development to production Docker configurations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify image versions and their contents
# Check if the images exist and their creation dates
docker pull getmaxun/maxun-backend:v0.0.7
docker pull getmaxun/maxun-frontend:v0.0.3
docker inspect getmaxun/maxun-backend:v0.0.7 | jq '.[].Created'
docker inspect getmaxun/maxun-frontend:v0.0.3 | jq '.[].Created'

Length of output: 609


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the architectural changes by checking for Dockerfile contents
# and any related configuration files that might show the production setup

# Check for Dockerfiles
fd Dockerfile

# Look for any deployment or environment configuration files
fd -e yaml -e yml -e env

# Check for documentation about deployment
fd README.md

# Let's also look for any configuration management in package.json files
fd package.json

# Examine the content of found files for deployment-related configurations
cat $(fd -e md) 2>/dev/null || true
cat $(fd package.json) 2>/dev/null || true
cat $(fd Dockerfile) 2>/dev/null || true

Length of output: 16697

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 86-86: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: New Release Releases for Maxun - Bug Fix, Feature, HotFix, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants