Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: scrapeList empty output preview #264

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

fix: scrapeList empty output preview #264

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

RohitR311
Copy link
Collaborator

@RohitR311 RohitR311 commented Dec 16, 2024

  1. Add action pair to workflow before decision socket emission
  2. Handle deletion of selector based on user decision

fix: #102

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced workflow generation process with improved handling of workflow pairs.
    • Simplified custom action recording to ensure consistent addition to workflows.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted logic for processing selectors based on decision events, improving clarity and efficiency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes focus on modifying the WorkflowGenerator class in the workflow management system. The modifications primarily involve adjusting the logic for handling workflow pairs and custom actions. The code now processes decision events differently, with changes to how selectors are managed and how pairs are added to the workflow. The modifications aim to streamline the workflow generation process and potentially address issues with action capture and storage.

Changes

File Change Summary
server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts - Modified decision event handling logic
- Simplified customAction method
- Removed commented-out code
- Updated selector processing for workflow pairs

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Capture List Action Storage [#102] Unclear if the changes fully resolve the action storage issue without additional context or testing

Poem

🤖 A robot's tale of workflow might,
Where selectors dance and actions ignite,
Code trimmed with precision's keen blade,
Pairs processed, no logic delayed,
In Generator's realm, efficiency reigns bright! 🔧

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4469325 and 23ac134.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts (4)

148-151: Improved selector handling logic.

The code now filters out the last used selector instead of replacing the entire selector array. This is a better approach as it:

  1. Preserves other valid selectors
  2. More precisely handles the user's decision to exclude a specific selector

366-367: Improved action sequence in customAction method.

The code now correctly adds the pair to the workflow before emitting the decision event. This aligns with the PR objective and ensures that:

  1. The workflow is updated before any user decisions
  2. The decision event has access to the latest workflow state

Also applies to: 380-380


143-151: Verify the impact of removing browser retrieval logic.

The browser and page retrieval logic has been commented out, but the code still uses the id from browserPool. This could potentially cause issues if the browser ID is needed for other operations.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:

The browser retrieval logic can be safely removed

The commented out browser retrieval code in Generator.ts is not critical for the decision handling flow because:

  • The browser and page instances are primarily used in other components for active browser operations (screenshots, URL retrieval, interpretation)
  • The decision handling logic in Generator.ts only deals with selector management and doesn't require browser/page access
  • The actual browser operations are handled by the browser-management components where the browser retrieval is properly maintained
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if browser/page is used elsewhere in the decision handling
rg -A 5 "browserPool\.getRemoteBrowser|getCurrentPage" | grep -v "Generator.ts"

Length of output: 10269


156-158: Verify workflow consistency after removing addPairToWorkflow call.

The removal of addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient call after decision handling could affect workflow state consistency. This change appears to be part of fixing the sequence of operations, but we should verify that pairs are still properly added to the workflow in all scenarios.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the context gathered, I can now provide the final response:

Removal of addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient call is intentional and safe

The commented-out code was part of the decision handling logic where the pair would be added to the workflow after processing the decision. However, the codebase shows that addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient is properly called in all other necessary workflow generation paths (click events, URL changes, keypresses, and custom actions) as seen in the multiple active calls found. The removal here appears to be an intentional fix to prevent duplicate pair additions during decision handling.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for all calls to addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient to verify the workflow update paths
ast-grep --pattern 'await this.addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient($_, $_)'

Length of output: 542


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context around these calls to understand the workflow paths
rg -B 5 -A 5 "await this.addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient" server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts

# Also check the implementation of this method
ast-grep --pattern 'addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient($_, $_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1719


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the broader context of the commented out section to understand the workflow
rg -B 20 -A 10 "if \(currentPage\) {" server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts

Length of output: 195


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the broader context of the commented out section, fixing the regex
rg -B 20 -A 10 "if.*currentPage.*{" server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts

# Also let's see where pairs are added to the workflow
ast-grep --pattern 'this.workflow.push($_)'

Length of output: 235


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the broader context of the commented out section with fixed regex
rg -B 20 -A 10 "currentPage" server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts

# Let's also check the implementation of addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient
ast-grep --pattern 'private addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient($_, $_) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 1892


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@RohitR311 RohitR311 changed the title fix: add pair to workflow before decision socket emission fix: scrapeList empty output preview Dec 16, 2024
@amhsirak amhsirak added the Type: Bug Something isn't working label Dec 16, 2024
@amhsirak amhsirak merged commit 0ed4c8a into develop Dec 17, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants