-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 443
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: scrapeList empty output preview #264
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes focus on modifying the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Tip CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts (4)
The code now filters out the last used selector instead of replacing the entire selector array. This is a better approach as it:
The code now correctly adds the pair to the workflow before emitting the decision event. This aligns with the PR objective and ensures that:
Also applies to: 380-380
The browser and page retrieval logic has been commented out, but the code still uses the ✅ Verification successfulBased on the search results, I can now generate the final response: The browser retrieval logic can be safely removed The commented out browser retrieval code in
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check if browser/page is used elsewhere in the decision handling
rg -A 5 "browserPool\.getRemoteBrowser|getCurrentPage" | grep -v "Generator.ts"
Length of output: 10269
The removal of ✅ Verification successfulBased on the context gathered, I can now provide the final response: Removal of addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient call is intentional and safe The commented-out code was part of the decision handling logic where the pair would be added to the workflow after processing the decision. However, the codebase shows that 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for all calls to addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient to verify the workflow update paths
ast-grep --pattern 'await this.addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient($_, $_)'
Length of output: 542 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context around these calls to understand the workflow paths
rg -B 5 -A 5 "await this.addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient" server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts
# Also check the implementation of this method
ast-grep --pattern 'addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient($_, $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1719 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the broader context of the commented out section to understand the workflow
rg -B 20 -A 10 "if \(currentPage\) {" server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts
Length of output: 195 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the broader context of the commented out section, fixing the regex
rg -B 20 -A 10 "if.*currentPage.*{" server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts
# Also let's see where pairs are added to the workflow
ast-grep --pattern 'this.workflow.push($_)'
Length of output: 235 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the broader context of the commented out section with fixed regex
rg -B 20 -A 10 "currentPage" server/src/workflow-management/classes/Generator.ts
# Let's also check the implementation of addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient
ast-grep --pattern 'private addPairToWorkflowAndNotifyClient($_, $_) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 1892 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
fix: #102
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes