Refactor CONTRIBUTING.md: Removes slash at closure of Image Tag in Section 2.4

[mSharifHub]

Fixes #7097

What changes did you make?

-Root Directory CONTRIBUTING.md file refactored by removing slash at end of closure image tag on Section 2.4
make it better

For Reviewers: Do not test changes locally, rather test changes at https://github.com/mSharifHub/website/tree/img-tag-refactor-contributing.md-sec.2.4.b-%237097/CONTRIBUTING.md

Why did you make the changes (we will use this info to test)?

-As requested in the Issue to meet the same syntax format of other tags

Screenshots of Proposed Changes To The Website (if any, please do not include screenshots of code changes)

-No visual changes to the website

[github-actions]

Want to review this pull request? Take a look at this documentation for a step by step guide!

---

Note that CONTRIBUTING.md cannot previewed locally; rather it should be previewed at this URL:

https://github.com/mSharifHub/website/blob/img-tag-refactor-contributing.md-sec.2.4.b-#7097/CONTRIBUTING.md  

[k-cardon]

Code and branch look correct, and the PR is clear. One change needed--the link to the correct page to confirm no visual changes is broken--when I click the link you provided, it returns 404 not found.

[codyyjxn]

Thank you for taking on this issue @mSharifHub
Things that went well:
-You made the correct branch name.

• The change on the file is correct.

Somethings you need to complete is:

• You need to check the boxes from the original issue.
• You also need to provide the link as the issue prompted you to do.
• I don't see a URL where I can go to see what changes you made.

[mSharifHub]

Hey, I just noticed the feedback. I will do the above, however, there is no visual changes. The original issue is asking to remove the slash at ending index. This is not visible to the end user rather just a syntax style change.

[k-cardon]

The issue persists--this link is broken:

https://github.com/mSharifHub/website/tree/img-tag-refactor-contributing.md-sec.2.4.b-#7097/CONTRIBUTING.md

correct link is needed to the contributing page so we can verify no visual changes. Maybe a reread of the issue would help? Or just a working link to the relevant section of the contributing page? (I was a bit confused by the issue directions as well)

[mSharifHub]

interesting. i did the above https://github.com/mSharifHub/website/blob/img-tag-refactor-contributing.md-sec.2.4.b-#709/CONTRIBUTING.md and shows a 404

[mSharifHub]

Yah, I dont know why the link is broken,

[mSharifHub]

I sent a message on slack. I followed all instructions yet I dont know why the link is broken. Im sorry, I only have been with Hack For LA for a short period. I will be waiting for someone to help resolve the broken link.

[ajb176]

Hi @mSharifHub

It looks like you've tried to guess the URL based on the example URL Roslyn provided, that isn't working because your branch URL has the character '#' that needs to be escaped.

You just need to manually navigate to the branch in your local repo where you've made the changes, click on the contributing.md file in that branch, and link the URL you get.

[mSharifHub]

You totaly right, the "#" needs to be escaped. I should had named differently . I updated with %23

[codyyjxn]

Well Done ! @mSharifHub

[ajb176]

Looks good, nice work. A few notes for next time:

• You can easily just get the link by clicking on mSharifHub:img-tag-refactor-contributing.md-sec.2.4.b-#7097 above the PR, then scrolling down and clicking on the contributing.md file. Although just escaping the '#' works, it's easy to just navigate to where the file is located on your fork and copy/paste the URL there.
• Unless you have a reason to, it's best not to request review from specific reviewers. They may be busy or may not be active, which could delay the PR from being reviewed.
• Your branch name is very detailed which is great, but something like
  img-tag-refactor-contributing-7097 is also good enough if you'd rather keep it simpler. It doesn't matter too much but as you've seen, using some characters like '#' can make things a little more complicated.

Anyway, nice work on the issue.

[mSharifHub]

Hello,

Yes the branch should be kept detail but simple. Thanks for the feedback and approving it.