-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: parallelize ensuring active pools on startup #1525
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Enrique Lacal <enrique.lacal@kaleido.io>
// by one of the goroutines. | ||
if err := g.Wait(); err != nil { | ||
// The above handleMessage will retry if errors occur | ||
return err |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a change in behavior - the previous ft.EnsureTokenPoolActive(ctx, currentPool)
code did not crash the namespace start in the case it failed to activate a token pool.
It might be a positive change in behavior, but it would need some analysis/thinking (probably from @awrichar?) as to why the previous code intentionally did not fail on this condition before.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I thought about that, it felt weird to me that it didn't fail on startup... Would love to hear @awrichar thoughts on this one
@@ -716,16 +717,31 @@ func (ft *FFTokens) handleNamespaceStarted(ctx context.Context, data fftypes.JSO | |||
// Make sure any pools that are marked as active in our DB are indeed active | |||
namespace := data.GetString("namespace") | |||
log.L(ctx).Debugf("Token connector '%s' started namespace '%s'. Ensuring all token pools active.", ft.Name(), namespace) | |||
|
|||
g, ctx := errgroup.WithContext(ctx) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like using `SetLimit() on the concurrency would be better than a completely unbounded parallelism against the token connector:
https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/sync/errgroup#Group.SetLimit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea - will set that to the number of pools to activate
When a large number of token pools are active and namespace is restarted, it take a long time to activate one by one each token pool. This PR spins a new go routine for each API call.