-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 389
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ Add CRDs to built-in types #3018
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mangirdas Judeikis <mangirdas@judeikis.lt>
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/test all |
/test pull-kcp-lint |
/test pull-kcp-lint |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
|
||
// CRDs are not included in the genericcontrolplane scheme (because they're part of the apiextensions apiserver), | ||
// so we have to manually add them | ||
allKnownTypes[schema.GroupVersionKind{Group: "apiextensions.k8s.io", Version: "v1", Kind: "CustomResourceDefinition"}] = reflect.TypeOf(struct{}{}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isn't that still the case?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think so. We add this to schema bellow? No?
reference := r.Reference() // recursive CRDs are not supported | ||
if reference == "io.k8s.apiextensions-apiserver.pkg.apis.apiextensions.v1.JSONSchemaProps" { | ||
return | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's the consequence of this? Who wants to crdpull CRDs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
need to test crd pulling case :/ tbh this was very quick PR. Needs more testing. And this feedback kelps to identify the areas for testing :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that pulling the CRD type, not CRDs (= instances), is very meta 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this does not impact CRD pulling. We already converts APIS into CRDs
Tested crd-puller and it just worked. Might be some edge cases but not sure how to identify those without knowing what I'm looking for ;)
@@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ func init() { | |||
install.Install(Scheme) | |||
authenticationinstall.Install(Scheme) | |||
authorizationinstall.Install(Scheme) | |||
apiextensionsinstall.Install(Scheme) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is the line I missed.
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: d63568189c4369e1f79e94b2b6e76a7bcc773658
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sttts The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary
Attempt to add CRDs to built-in types so they could be claimed
Related issue(s)
Fixes #
Release Notes