Support for Static Linux SDK Based on Musl Instead of Glibc #1058
+18
−0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello,
I am currently working on a project that requires the use of a static Linux SDK. We are opting to use Musl instead of Glibc due to its excellent support for static linking and its permissive licensing, which simplifies the distribution of statically linked executables.
To ensure compatibility with Musl, I suggest a modification in the conditional compilation statements for importing C libraries. Here is the current code:
#if canImport(Darwin)
import Darwin
#elseif canImport(Glibc)
import Glibc
#elseif canImport(WinSDK)
import WinSDK
#endif
And here is the proposed change:
#if canImport(Darwin)
import Darwin
#elseif canImport(Glibc)
import Glibc
#elseif canImport(Musl)
import Musl
#elseif canImport(WinSDK)
import WinSDK
#endif
This change will allow the framework to dynamically check for the availability of Glibc or Musl, thus supporting environments built with Musl. This would greatly enhance the flexibility and usability of SwifterSwift in various Linux environments.
For further reference on static linking in Linux, you can visit the official Swift documentation:
Static Linux Getting Started.
Thank you for considering this enhancement.