-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🐛 Fix for TestServerSideApplyWithDefaulting #10307
🐛 Fix for TestServerSideApplyWithDefaulting #10307
Conversation
/area ci |
/test pull-cluster-api-test-main |
2 similar comments
/test pull-cluster-api-test-main |
/test pull-cluster-api-test-main |
@fabriziopandini @chrischdi if this looks ok, can we merge this before today's release? I have run tests multiple times on this PR, I haven't seen any failure yet. |
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ func TestServerSideApplyWithDefaulting(t *testing.T) { | |||
|
|||
// Enable the new defaulting logic (i.e. simulate the Cluster API update). | |||
// The webhook will default the users field to `[{Name: "default-user"}]`. | |||
g.Expect(env.Create(ctx, mutatingWebhookConfiguration)).To(Succeed()) | |||
g.Expect(env.CreateAndWait(ctx, mutatingWebhookConfiguration)).To(Succeed()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry but this doesn't make sense.
The test is failing in l.683 because the KubeadmConfigTemplate doesn't exist in the local cache. Here we are waiting for MutatingWebhookConfiguration.
It probably fixes the issue by accident but I would prefer waiting for the right object (which is kct)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's add the following instead in l.652
// Let's wait until the initial KubeadmConfigTemplate is visible in the local cache. Otherwise the test fails below.
g.Eventually(ctx, func(g Gomega) {
g.Expect(env.Get(ctx, client.ObjectKeyFromObject(kct), &bootstrapv1.KubeadmConfigTemplate{})).To(Succeed())
}, 5*time.Second).Should(Succeed())
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have added the wait for kct too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's get rid of the CreateAndWait in l.661. We absolutely don't depend on mutatingWebhookConfiguration showing up in the local client cache
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
c16f2e2
to
885c5a5
Compare
Signed-off-by: muhammad adil ghaffar <muhammad.adil.ghaffar@est.tech>
885c5a5
to
6cb0a98
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-test-main |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: ac4382cac51f502e9d58d7f283e25ef7f904008c
|
/approve Thx! Feel free to cherry-pick if needed |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-1.6 |
@adilGhaffarDev: new pull request created: #10327 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/cherry-pick release-1.5 |
/cherry-pick release-1.4 |
@adilGhaffarDev: new pull request created: #10344 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@adilGhaffarDev: new pull request created: #10345 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
same failure is happening in release 1-5: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/periodic-cluster-api-test-release-1-5/1773266012418871296 |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):possibly Fixes #10305