-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] ✨ Add MachinePool Machines implementation #6089
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@mboersma: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@mboersma: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/remove-lifecycle stale
Hi @OmkarDeshpande7, sorry for my late reponse (I was on vacation). This PR will be closed soon in favor of a new one that follows the finalized proposal. I've been reimplementing this in a different way, reusing the existing DockerMachine resources instead of creating a parallel DockerMachinePoolMachine resource. I'm getting there but it's been slow, apologies for the wait. I'll tag you in the new PR when it's out there. I was going to wait until then to close this, but if it's causing confusion feel free to close it now, it's just a reference POC for a previous version of the proposal. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
Hey @mboersma, Thank you for working on this as this is a really important and big change. A lot of things depend on it like kubernetes/autoscaler#4676. Was there a replacement PR for this? |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
@mboersma - Can you please post a link to anything which references the "favor of a new one that follows the finalized proposal."? |
@dtzar AFAIK, this is the latest version of the machinepool machines proposal that I'm going off of. |
Closing in favor of #7938. |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Implements the MachinePool Machines proposal in CAPI and for the Docker provider. This should be considered a POC and is intended to help illuminate the proposal and any shortcomings or issues it may have.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #4063