Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] ✨ Add MachinePool Machines implementation #6089

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma mboersma commented Feb 9, 2022

What this PR does / why we need it:

Implements the MachinePool Machines proposal in CAPI and for the Docker provider. This should be considered a POC and is intended to help illuminate the proposal and any shortcomings or issues it may have.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #4063

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign cecilerobertmichon after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @cecilerobertmichon in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mboersma mboersma changed the title ✨ Add MachinePool Machines implementation [WIP] ✨ Add MachinePool Machines implementation Feb 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 9, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 22, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-ipv6-main d64fec0 link false /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-ipv6-main
pull-cluster-api-build-main d64fec0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-build-main
pull-cluster-api-test-main d64fec0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-test-main
pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main d64fec0 link false /test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-main d64fec0 link false /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-informing-main
pull-cluster-api-verify-main d64fec0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-verify-main
pull-cluster-api-e2e-main d64fec0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main d64fec0 link true /test pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 23, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 24, 2022
@OmkarDeshpande7
Copy link

Hi, @mboersma @Jont828 thanks for your efforts on this PR, much awaited changes indeed.
Just curious about the estimated timeline here. Thank you in advance.

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @OmkarDeshpande7, sorry for my late reponse (I was on vacation).

This PR will be closed soon in favor of a new one that follows the finalized proposal. I've been reimplementing this in a different way, reusing the existing DockerMachine resources instead of creating a parallel DockerMachinePoolMachine resource.

I'm getting there but it's been slow, apologies for the wait. I'll tag you in the new PR when it's out there. I was going to wait until then to close this, but if it's causing confusion feel free to close it now, it's just a reference POC for a previous version of the proposal.

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.

This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue or PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Mark this issue or PR as rotten with /lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue or PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 10, 2022
@anmolsachan
Copy link

Hey @mboersma, Thank you for working on this as this is a really important and big change. A lot of things depend on it like kubernetes/autoscaler#4676.

Was there a replacement PR for this?
Also, do you have any timelines for this and the autoscalar support work? I and my team will be happy to help out on this if you need any help here.

@OmkarDeshpande7
Copy link

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 14, 2022
@dtzar
Copy link
Contributor

dtzar commented Dec 5, 2022

@mboersma - Can you please post a link to anything which references the "favor of a new one that follows the finalized proposal."?

@Jont828
Copy link
Contributor

Jont828 commented Jan 9, 2023

@dtzar AFAIK, this is the latest version of the machinepool machines proposal that I'm going off of.

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #7938.

@mboersma mboersma closed this Jan 17, 2023
@mboersma mboersma deleted the capd-mpms branch March 19, 2024 18:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Resources representing MachinePool Machines
8 participants