Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Fix Vim freeze on tag:annotate and tag:sign actions #140

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lambdalisue
Copy link
Owner

@lambdalisue lambdalisue commented Aug 20, 2024

Close #137

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced tagging system allowing for interactive tag creation with more flexible options.
    • Introduced a force parameter to streamline tag creation.
  • Improvements

    • Simplified the tagging process by reducing complexity and improving control flow.
    • Improved responsiveness of the tagging interface to enhance user experience.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes enhance the tagging system's interactivity by replacing the doTag function with doTagInteractive, allowing users to create tags with greater flexibility. The doTag function has been simplified, accepting fewer parameters and focusing on processing a single candidate. Overall, these modifications streamline user interaction, avoid interface blocking, and improve the tagging flow, making it more intuitive and efficient.

Changes

Files Change Summary
denops/gin/action/tag.ts Refactored doTag to simplify parameters and replaced its usage with doTagInteractive in init. Enhanced interactivity and added a force parameter to improve tagging functionality.

Poem

In the garden of code, so bright and fair,
A tag is born with a hop and a dare.
With interactive flair, it dances along,
Simplifying the flow, making it strong.
Hooray for the changes, a joyful delight,
Let’s tag and rejoice through day and night! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0c0c476 and 39a570b.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • denops/gin/action/tag.ts (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
denops/gin/action/tag.ts (3)

19-19: LGTM! Ensure consistent usage of doTagInteractive.

The changes to use doTagInteractive enhance interactivity and flexibility. The code changes are approved.

Verify that the transition from doTag to doTagInteractive is consistent throughout the codebase.

Run the following script to verify the function usage:

Also applies to: 26-34, 41-49, 56-56, 63-71, 78-86

Verification successful

Consistent Usage of doTagInteractive Verified

The function doTagInteractive is consistently used across the file denops/gin/action/tag.ts with varying arguments, which appears intentional for different functionalities. No inconsistencies were found.

  • Verified locations:
    • Multiple instances in denops/gin/action/tag.ts
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent usage of `doTagInteractive`.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Consistent usage of `doTagInteractive`.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'doTagInteractive'

Length of output: 1364


Line range hint 124-161: Enhanced doTagInteractive function looks good.

The integration of new logic and improvements in responsiveness enhance the user experience. The code changes are approved.

Verify that the function calls to doTagInteractive are correctly implemented.

Run the following script to verify the function usage:

Verification successful

Function calls to doTagInteractive are correctly implemented.

The function doTagInteractive is invoked multiple times within denops/gin/action/tag.ts with different parameters, indicating varied and appropriate usage scenarios. No issues found with the implementation.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `doTagInteractive` are correctly implemented.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct implementation of `doTagInteractive`.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'doTagInteractive'

Length of output: 1364


98-122: Simplified doTag function looks good.

The restructuring of doTag to handle fewer parameters and process only the first candidate simplifies the flow. The code changes are approved.

Verify that the function calls to doTag are updated to match the new signature.

Run the following script to verify the function usage:

Verification successful

Function doTag usage is correctly updated.

The doTag function is used with the new signature in the file denops/gin/action/tag.ts. All instances match the expected parameter list.

  • doTag calls are correctly updated to match the new signature.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `doTag` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type ts -A 5 $'doTag'

Length of output: 2229

@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit 13be7ce into main Aug 20, 2024
7 checks passed
@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the fix-tag branch August 20, 2024 18:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 58.07%. Comparing base (0c0c476) to head (39a570b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #140   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   58.07%   58.07%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines         861      861           
  Branches      101      101           
=======================================
  Hits          500      500           
  Misses        361      361           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

tag:annotate and tag:sign action freeze Vim/Neovim itself
1 participant