Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump version to 6.0.25 #203

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

FeiWang1119
Copy link
Contributor

update changelog

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: FeiWang1119

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin pr auto review

这个提交的改动主要是更新了debian/changelog文件,添加了一个新的版本记录。从代码审查的角度来看,这个改动是合理的,但可以提出以下建议:

  1. 版本号格式:确保版本号遵循标准的语义化版本控制(Semantic Versioning)格式,即主版本号.次版本号.修订号。例如,6.0.25是一个有效的版本号。

  2. 提交信息:在changelog文件中,提交信息应该简洁明了,并且包含足够的上下文信息,以便其他开发者理解这个版本的改动。虽然这个提交信息中包含了版本号,但可以进一步说明这个版本引入了哪些新功能或修复了哪些问题。

  3. 日期格式:日期格式应该统一,并且使用标准的日期格式。在这个例子中,日期格式是正确的,但建议检查整个changelog文件,确保日期格式的一致性。

  4. 签名:提交信息中包含了签名信息,这是好的做法,可以确保提交的作者身份。但是,确保签名信息是正确的,并且使用的是正确的签名工具。

  5. 版本号更新:在changelog文件中,版本号应该按照从新到旧的顺序排列。在这个例子中,新版本6.0.25应该放在旧版本6.0.24之前。

综上所述,这个提交的改动是合理的,但可以进一步改进提交信息,确保版本号格式和日期格式的一致性,以及按照从新到旧的顺序排列版本号。

Copy link

TAG Bot

TAG: 6.0.25
EXISTED: no
DISTRIBUTION: unstable

@FeiWang1119
Copy link
Contributor Author

/topic dtk6-6.0.25

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Add topic: dtk6-6.0.25 successed.

@FeiWang1119 FeiWang1119 merged commit 3fa8f28 into linuxdeepin:master Dec 17, 2024
10 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants