publish: sequential storage crate post

 ### Summary

 This week, we are reposting a neat article on a sequential storage
 crate created by Dion Dockter at Tweede Golf!

 ### Test Plan

 - [ ] Check links
 - [ ] Visual check

_data/authors.yml

@@ -357,3 +357,11 @@ jphutchins:
   github: JPhutchins
   linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/j-p-hutchins-17357547/
   blurb: is a firmware engineer at Intercreate.
+diondokter:
+  name: Dion Dokter
+  web: https://tweedegolf.nl/en/about/23/dion
+  image: /img/author/diondokter.jpeg
+  email: dion@tweedegolf.com
+  github: diondokter
+  blurb:
+    is an experienced Rust and embedded software engineer at Tweede Golf. He also created and maintains a number of open source projects.

_posts/2024-11-14-sequential-storage-crate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+---
+title: Sequential-storage － Efficiently Store Data in Flash
+description:
+  A discussion of a sequential storage crate which can be used in Rust projects
+  for efficiently storing data in NOR flash.
+author: diondokter
+tags: [rust, flash]
+image: /img/sequential-storage-crate/sequential-storage-main-image.jpg
+---
+
+<!-- excerpt start -->
+
+While using a full-blown filesystem for storing your data in non-volatile memory
+is common practice, those filesystems are often too big, not to mention annoying
+to use, for the things I want to do. My solution? I've been hard at work
+creating the
+[sequential-storage crate](https://crates.io/crates/sequential-storage). In this
+blog post I'd like to go over what it is, why I created it and what it does.
+
+<!-- excerpt end -->
+
+{% include newsletter.html %}
+
+{% include toc.html %}
+
+Sequential-storage implements low-level NOR flash memory management so you can
+store fifo queues and key-value maps in memory. This makes the crate very
+well-suited for data caches and configs. The special thing about this crate is
+that it minimizes page erases and that's where the name comes from.
+
+A naïve implementation would store one item per page. If you then have a config
+that is updated every minute or so, you'd have to erase the config every minute
+and write out the new state. A 10K erases flash would only last ~7 days and a
+100K erases flash only ~70 days. That's far too short for any serious embedded
+application.
+
+So instead of storing a value on a page, we should be a bit smarter. In this
+implementation multiple items are stored one after another on the same page,
+forming a sort of sequence. Hence, sequential-storage.
+
+![Store on page 0 meme](/img/sequential-storage-crate/stored-on-page-0-meme.png)
+
+For example, if you want to update the value of a key in the key-value map data
+structure, a new item is appended instead of erasing it and then writing it
+again.
+
+After many extra features, lots of fuzz testing, and code hardening we've now
+gotten to the current state of the crate.
+
+## Why create it?
+
+It wasn't the first time we needed a crate like sequential-storage. In fact,
+this is the second such crate in [our GitHub](https://github.com/tweedegolf).
+
+The first one was called [nvm-log](https://github.com/tweedegolf/nvm-log) and
+was initially written by a colleague of mine. We used it to store log messages
+from our device in flash so we could send them to the server later.
+
+If you look at the code of nvm-log, you'll see some things that, at least
+conceptually, carried over into sequential-storage. There are page states, and
+items in flash are written sequentially.
+
+Nvm-log worked fine for the exact application it was written for. However, when
+we wanted to reuse nvm-log in a new application, we ran into some issues. For
+this new project we needed two things that nvm-log at least in theory could do:
+Cache messages to be sent to the server later, and keep a config.
+
+What we found was that the old crate had many assumptions and breaking those
+assumptions meant we had to deal with bugs and API choices that didn't fit our
+new application. Note however that creating a crate like this in one go is very
+hard to do! It's very reasonable that nvm-log wasn't perfect.
+
+Fixing the bugs and APIs wouldn't have been a problem normally, but nvm-log was
+written in a way where pretty much everything was implicit. It would need to
+deal with implicit page states and item layouts. Because this was all implicit,
+you never knew what was already checked for in each part of the library. This
+made it difficult to fix the bugs we encountered.
+
+After every bug fixed another popped up a bit later. At some point I got fed up
+with it and decided to write something new from scratch. It would benefit from
+lessons learned from nvm-log, would be far less opinionated, and would have more
+features.
+
+## What does sequential store do?
+
+(I only give some background here. For up-to-date technical details, go to the
+[repo](https://github.com/tweedegolf/sequential-storage).)
+
+The main thing I learned from nvm-log is that I wanted sequential-storage to be
+explicit and with little runtime state. The biggest change was the way the API
+was presented to the user.
+
+Nvm-log was a queue data structure. You would give the crate a reference to your
+flash, which it would hold on to. It would then search for the address where the
+next log could be stored. After that you'd have an nvm-log instance where you
+could store a new item or get an iterator over all items currently stored.
+
+Wanted to do something with your flash while holding the nvm-log instance? Well,
+the flash is already borrowed.
+
+Sequential-storage doesn't hold on to your flash, or anything for that matter.
+In fact, the crate exposes (almost) all APIs as free-standing functions. This
+make the use of the API very flexible at the cost of having to provide some
+parameters every time. You won't have to fight the borrow checker (because I've
+already defeated it for you in the crate internals 😈).
+
+This style also forces all information to always be stored in flash. This makes
+everything very predictable since there are no bugs that can hide in the runtime
+state.
+
+There are so many things I like about the current design:
+
+- Page states are now explicit, with many functions to change the states and to
+  read them out.
+- Items, the things that actually get stored in flash, are very well-defined and
+  CRC-protected.
+- The user can provide the big ram buffer that is used to read the flash bytes
+  into.
+- This allows the user to put the buffer in static memory instead of it being
+  forced on the stack.
+- Users can decide how big it is which allows them to minimize the memory usage
+  based on their data.
+- The crate has been thoroughly fuzzed with simulated early device shutoff
+- Any corruption due to early shutoff can be repaired
+- And more...
+
+## Latest Developments
+
+The last thing I've been working on is the implementation of caching.
+
+While it's nice to not hold any volatile runtime state, it isn't great for
+performance. Any time you need to fetch something from the flash, it has to be
+searched for since the implementation can't possibly know where it was stored.
+This means the algorithms have to do a lot of reads, which slows everything
+down.
+
+With the new cache functionality, a lot of searching can be skipped. There are
+different implementations users can pick from, which offer different performance
+and memory use trade-offs.
+
+And yes, this sounds like a huge pile of runtime state, something I was trying
+to avoid. However, the cache is optional and you can opt to go without. This
+means the code still has to be written as though the cache doesn't exist. The
+cache merely serves as an early return if some information is available in
+cache.
+
+By making the cache optional, finding bugs remains easy. Simply don't use the
+cache and if the bug is still there, the bug is in the main logic. Otherwise,
+it's a caching issue.
+
+## Conclusion - Towards 1.0
+
+The crate is already being used in production. Two of our clients and at least
+two projects 'out there' (i.e. not mine or Tweede golf's) use it.
+
+As I continue to work on it, my wishlist is getting smaller. There are only a
+few things that I think are still missing. Once my wishlist is small enough, it
+would make sense to switch the version to a 1.0 release to mark the crate as
+'done' (although I'll still be updating and doing releases).
+
+Is there a feature that you're missing that stops you from using
+sequential-storage? Let me know! I might be able to implement it.
+
+> **Note**: This article was originally published by Dion on the Tweede Golf
+> blog. You can find the original article
+> [here](https://tweedegolf.nl/en/blog/115/sequential-storage-efficiently-store-data-in-flash).
+
+<!-- Interrupt Keep START -->
+
+{% include newsletter.html %}
+
+{% include submit-pr.html %}
+
+<!-- Interrupt Keep END -->
+
+{:.no_toc}