chore(datafile): ignore lint rule for codacy, pending refactor #2363
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Codacy began detecting a "severe" pylint E1126
invalid sequence indexviolation in #2362.The issue pre-existed that PR, I think the format changes just revealed it. We could just ignore it in the web UI but this is probably worth coming back to, to appease linters and type checkers and to make the code easier to reason about.
Relatedly, there is work ongoing to make ruff work with codacy, so hopefully in future we can use ruff ignore syntax for things like this if/when needed