act dind flag

[ChristopherHX]

Adds --dind flag, disabling this flag is causing errors :(

This makes the following work and mount $PWD correctly

Fixes #pod

on: push
jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: test
    steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v4
    - run: docker info
      shell: sh
    - run: docker run -v $PWD:$PWD --rm alpine:latest ls $PWD
      shell: sh

Could resolve #2393 or not, but not tested with podman host....

[github-actions]

🦙 MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor	Linter	Files	Fixed	Errors	Elapsed time
✅ EDITORCONFIG	editorconfig-checker	4		0	0.03s
✅ REPOSITORY	gitleaks	yes		no	2.3s
✅ REPOSITORY	git_diff	yes		no	0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY	grype	yes		no	9.07s
✅ REPOSITORY	secretlint	yes		no	1.02s
✅ REPOSITORY	trivy-sbom	yes		no	0.47s
✅ REPOSITORY	trufflehog	yes		no	4.19s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports
Set VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASE: true in mega-linter.yml to validate all sources, not only the diff

MegaLinter is graciously provided by

[mergify]

@ChristopherHX this pull request has failed checks 🛠

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 3.84615% with 25 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.35%. Comparing base (5a80a04) to head (ea7100f).
Report is 99 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/runner/run_context.go	3.84%	24 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2420       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   61.56%   76.35%   +14.79%     
===========================================
  Files          53       62        +9     
  Lines        9002     8180      -822     
===========================================
+ Hits         5542     6246      +704     
+ Misses       3020     1367     -1653     
- Partials      440      567      +127     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mergify]

@ChristopherHX this pull request has failed checks 🛠

[ChristopherHX]

I totally forget about exposing ports from container.

hijacking a docker-proxy binary with a script might be able to do the proxy logic in the job container to match expectations.