[bugfix] don't allow qlinearmatmul to match output Q/DQ block meant for next quantizable node #1700
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…or next quantizable node
Closed
|
[Noting] the commits from this diff have been verified and cherrypicked to #1701 |
|
#1701 rebases onto this - closing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
currently, if a Q/DQ -> MatMul -> Q/DQ -> MatMul series of nodes occurs, the first matmul may be matched as a target for a
QLinearMatMulconversion even though the output Q/DQ block is meant for the second matmulthis adds a simple check to skip these cases. this issue was brought up in testing of quantizing distilbert by @rahul-tuli
test-plan:
to be tested by @rahul-tuli