Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-30438: Bump protobuf dependency #237

Merged

Conversation

MaysaMacedo
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 8, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MaysaMacedo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30438, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30438 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.17.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from gnufied and mandre August 8, 2024 20:08
@MaysaMacedo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-openstack-csi

Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. It looks like we'll need to bump the github.com/golang/protobuf lib as well due to a regression introduced in google.golang.org/protobuf v1.33.0. See golang/protobuf#1596.

@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ require (
google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api v0.0.0-20240125205218-1f4bbc51befe // indirect
google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc v0.0.0-20240125205218-1f4bbc51befe // indirect
google.golang.org/grpc v1.61.0 // indirect
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.32.0 // indirect
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.33.0 // indirect
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you see golang/protobuf#1596?

Looks like we'll also need to bump github.com/golang/protobuf to v1.5.4. We currently have it to the incompatible v1.5.3 version.

@MaysaMacedo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MaysaMacedo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30438, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30438 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.17.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@MaysaMacedo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MaysaMacedo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30438, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@MaysaMacedo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 22, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MaysaMacedo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30438, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38843 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38843 targets the "4.17.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.17.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (itbrown@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 22, 2024
@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/approve
/lgtm
/hold for CI

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 22, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 22, 2024
@eurijon
Copy link

eurijon commented Aug 22, 2024

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Aug 22, 2024
@MaysaMacedo
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-openstack-csi

@EmilienM
Copy link
Member

/label backport-risk-assessed

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 22, 2024

@EmilienM: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-staff-engineers]

In response to this:

/label backport-risk-assessed

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 22, 2024

@MaysaMacedo: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Aug 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 26, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: EmilienM, mandre, MaysaMacedo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mandre
Copy link
Member

mandre commented Aug 26, 2024

CI is passing, we can remove the hold.
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 26, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit bdac0fd into openshift:release-4.16 Aug 26, 2024
7 checks passed
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot deleted the bump-protobuf branch August 26, 2024 15:12
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MaysaMacedo: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30438: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-30438 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: csi-driver-manila-operator
This PR has been included in build csi-driver-manila-operator-container-v4.16.0-202408262007.p0.gbdac0fd.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-08-28-181245

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants