Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pr51 #61

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Pr51 #61

merged 27 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

ajm143
Copy link
Contributor

@ajm143 ajm143 commented Nov 14, 2024

This was a tidy up of PR51. PR51 was already reviewed an accepted so I'm going to accept this one myself

ajm143 and others added 27 commits February 17, 2022 09:35
…tring which made it difficult to manage. I've made it a subroutine of the module -- it still passes the test suite, and I can't see a reason why it was so.
…d what's inside them, i.e. Si:exi, and will get upset.
…to learn that C matches C:exi and C matches C only.
- Added hyperlinks to aid navigation (why not)
- Listed the new compilers, and depricated the ones that TCM can no longer support.
- Updated the description ofthe PDOS string to include labels
- Added a new checkpoint. GaAs which has two labels
- Added the testopt_pdos_Ga_label to the test suite to test more pdos_string handling
- Solved some over-long lines in projection_utils
@ajm143 ajm143 self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
@ajm143 ajm143 merged commit bb8a1a9 into develop Nov 14, 2024
2 checks passed
@ajm143 ajm143 deleted the PR51 branch November 14, 2024 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants