Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade alpine from 3.10.1 to 3.18.3 #173

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dchourasia
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Changes included in this PR

  • Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to alpine:3.18.3, as this image has only 0 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Some of the most important vulnerabilities in your base image include:

Severity Priority Score / 1000 Issue Exploit Maturity
high severity 614 Out-of-bounds Read
SNYK-ALPINE310-APKTOOLS-1246341
No Known Exploit
critical severity 714 Out-of-bounds Read
SNYK-ALPINE310-APKTOOLS-1534688
No Known Exploit
high severity 614 Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions
SNYK-ALPINE310-BUSYBOX-1090151
No Known Exploit
critical severity 714 Out-of-bounds Write
SNYK-ALPINE310-MUSL-458452
No Known Exploit
critical severity 714 Out-of-bounds Write
SNYK-ALPINE310-MUSL-458452
No Known Exploit

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from LaVLaS and VaishnaviHire October 1, 2023 03:10
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dchourasia
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lavlas for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 1, 2023

@dchourasia: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/ci-index ef15f83 link true /test ci-index
ci/prow/48-ci-index ef15f83 link true /test 48-ci-index
ci/prow/modh-operator-e2e ef15f83 link false /test modh-operator-e2e
ci/prow/48-modh-operator-e2e-48 ef15f83 link false /test 48-modh-operator-e2e-48
ci/prow/48-images ef15f83 link true /test 48-images
ci/prow/images ef15f83 link true /test images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

zdtsw added a commit to zdtsw/opendatahub-operator that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
…#173)

* update(trustyai): adding logic to monitoring

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>

* fix(trustyai): prometheus rules for probe

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>

* update(trusty): prometheus to use job instead of instance name for
record rules

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Wen Zhou <wenzhou@redhat.com>
zdtsw pushed a commit to zdtsw/opendatahub-operator that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants