forked from openwrt/openwrt
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
mac80211: ath11k: include Ansuels peer fix
Include the Ansuels RFC peer fix that is pending upstream. Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@gmail.com>
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
210 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
210 changes: 210 additions & 0 deletions
210
...atches/ath11k/103-RFC-ath11k-fix-peer-addition-deletion-error-on-sta-band-migration.patch
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ | ||
From patchwork Fri Jun 3 16:45:59 2022 | ||
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" | ||
MIME-Version: 1.0 | ||
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit | ||
X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> | ||
X-Patchwork-Id: 12869226 | ||
X-Patchwork-Delegate: kvalo@adurom.com | ||
Return-Path: <linux-wireless-owner@kernel.org> | ||
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on | ||
aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org | ||
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) | ||
by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B21C433EF | ||
for <linux-wireless@archiver.kernel.org>; | ||
Fri, 3 Jun 2022 16:46:27 +0000 (UTC) | ||
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand | ||
id S1344074AbiFCQqZ (ORCPT | ||
<rfc822;linux-wireless@archiver.kernel.org>); | ||
Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:46:25 -0400 | ||
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44126 "EHLO | ||
lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org | ||
with ESMTP id S244871AbiFCQqY (ORCPT | ||
<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>); | ||
Fri, 3 Jun 2022 12:46:24 -0400 | ||
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com | ||
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) | ||
by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B551517F7 | ||
for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; | ||
Fri, 3 Jun 2022 09:46:22 -0700 (PDT) | ||
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id w27so10885628edl.7 | ||
for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; | ||
Fri, 03 Jun 2022 09:46:22 -0700 (PDT) | ||
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; | ||
d=gmail.com; s=20210112; | ||
h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version | ||
:content-transfer-encoding; | ||
bh=Woceb0Rke0kHZAKQOxFNrONpwZyqKA30q2Uef9j1sWg=; | ||
b=O+nr7Y4GlgXVxyiPhIS/JwPUvloVGcydyPndUaBGvyEf2pxef/YWw5Qqe6eac/4XzD | ||
voUH4cvEFs8nGlotS6fFiDzMX+owWrmB6mgMEf8rr/JF6tEI3ZSO2Uuj5U8456CcjlQf | ||
TYB0HwcKWQtGKWIa9ZOj28tDeWjuKEyFgs1jcaiIM9ZGaXLsQ/uXiVEq/0xl725fnCFj | ||
XRb7p/OD3ZgjurbGyrbq7DvqmJWo08nfqupNBp8WGebWXEi8sg9fvBsDLxVpOOu2M4cS | ||
QuFbo6lm+xP35t2tq4H6MEQUqLwYIn3x1YRRyw90Is6nTn4Z/Xx6O7bwNEtDnhqMl2Vs | ||
lQDw== | ||
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; | ||
d=1e100.net; s=20210112; | ||
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version | ||
:content-transfer-encoding; | ||
bh=Woceb0Rke0kHZAKQOxFNrONpwZyqKA30q2Uef9j1sWg=; | ||
b=NBKf3VB8uRQIiI/T/4Hk3VX7EtagxBI2SspjCiQ802whCCiWd0bSKC8jdb8dYw/Wkj | ||
kATAOOM5eGfgNDAdOAyqVifJYCUiNIOQQZ2vOxELDijlIgcFUOuqNovxHO6Sr7lMk45I | ||
Dgaf0Pil1rz+zjWSQ1u86rvCcqSnbaIM9jGntbtrPdgl20j8uvuviFiz8LtUlPkZ9NbF | ||
f0G1B7tDNpam620FCWyzUN3Bn4LjN1ljTXXltwL3Y0MC70pAmdDKE0ePca9p3IynDajp | ||
m6VxmzpRiAgpxYxuwLuy6l/YrwoU5Lx4lo3J2sXwgB3EX2zsidTFWHZ0QmhUBzlUAGOr | ||
Vxjw== | ||
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rVg/yOuT7Qeebj85paatNB4Ra/sFrhcEOXnkPg7W1gcoB077r | ||
JU5kxggE7Nam1E7i1ca7bDI= | ||
X-Google-Smtp-Source: | ||
ABdhPJwox2o3lpWBvFvHM5Z3hm3Ssg58lh8U+R8DMB58iiRmtt5SYLeE+KthNUIacPOMey6H2eiBrA== | ||
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:20c:b0:42b:d302:a80f with SMTP id | ||
t12-20020a056402020c00b0042bd302a80fmr11687092edv.330.1654274780902; | ||
Fri, 03 Jun 2022 09:46:20 -0700 (PDT) | ||
Received: from localhost.localdomain (93-42-70-190.ip85.fastwebnet.it. | ||
[93.42.70.190]) | ||
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id | ||
f22-20020a1709067f9600b006f3ef214db6sm3010819ejr.28.2022.06.03.09.46.20 | ||
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); | ||
Fri, 03 Jun 2022 09:46:20 -0700 (PDT) | ||
From: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> | ||
To: ath11k@lists.infradead.org | ||
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, | ||
Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> | ||
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ath11k: fix peer addition/deletion error on sta band | ||
migration | ||
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2022 18:45:59 +0200 | ||
Message-Id: <20220603164559.27769-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> | ||
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 | ||
MIME-Version: 1.0 | ||
Precedence: bulk | ||
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org> | ||
X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org | ||
|
||
This patch try to fix the following error. | ||
|
||
Wed Jun 1 22:19:30 2022 kern.warn kernel: [ 119.561227] ath11k c000000.wifi: peer already added vdev id 0 req, vdev id 1 present | ||
Wed Jun 1 22:19:30 2022 kern.warn kernel: [ 119.561282] ath11k c000000.wifi: Failed to add peer: 28:c2:1f:xx:xx:xx for VDEV: 0 | ||
Wed Jun 1 22:19:30 2022 kern.warn kernel: [ 119.568053] ath11k c000000.wifi: Failed to add station: 28:c2:1f:xx:xx:xx for VDEV: 0 | ||
Wed Jun 1 22:19:31 2022 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan2: STA 28:c2:1f:xx:xx:xx IEEE 802.11: Could not add STA to kernel driver | ||
Wed Jun 1 22:19:31 2022 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan2: STA 28:c2:1f:xx:xx:xx IEEE 802.11: did not acknowledge authentication response | ||
Wed Jun 1 22:19:31 2022 daemon.notice hostapd: wlan1: AP-STA-DISCONNECTED 28:c2:1f:xx:xx:xx | ||
Wed Jun 1 22:19:31 2022 daemon.info hostapd: wlan1: STA 28:c2:1f:xx:xx:xx IEEE 802.11: disassociated due to inactivity | ||
Wed Jun 1 22:19:32 2022 daemon.info hostapd: wlan1: STA 28:c2:1f:xx:xx:xx IEEE 802.11: deauthenticated due to inactivity (timer DEAUTH/REMOVE) | ||
|
||
To repro this: | ||
- Have 2 Wifi with the same bssid and pass on different band (2.4 and | ||
5GHz) | ||
- Enable 802.11r Fast Transaction with same mobility domain | ||
- FT Protocol: FT over the Air | ||
From a openwrt system issue the command (with the correct mac) | ||
ubus call hostapd.wlan1 wnm_disassoc_imminent '{"addr":"28:C2:1F:xx:xx:xx"}' | ||
Notice the log printing the errors. | ||
|
||
The cause of this error has been investigated and we found that this is | ||
related to the WiFi Fast Transaction feature. We observed that this is | ||
triggered when the router tells the device to change band. In this case | ||
the device first auth to the other band and then the disconnect path | ||
from the prev band is triggered. | ||
This is problematic with the current rhash implementation since the | ||
addrs is used as key and the logic of "adding first, delete later" | ||
conflicts with the rhash logic. | ||
In fact peer addition will fail since the peer is already added and with | ||
that fixed a peer deletion will cause unitended effect by removing the | ||
peer just added. | ||
|
||
Current solution to this is to add additional logic to the peer delete, | ||
make sure we are deleting the correct peer taken from the rhash | ||
table (and fallback to the peer list) and for the peer add logic delete | ||
the peer entry for the rhash list before adding the new one (counting as | ||
an error only when a peer with the same vlan_id is asked to be added). | ||
|
||
With this change, a sta can correctly transition from 2.4GHz and 5GHZ | ||
with no drop and no error are printed. | ||
|
||
Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.5.0.1-01208-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1 | ||
|
||
Fixes: 7b0c70d92a43 ("ath11k: Add peer rhash table support") | ||
Signed-off-by: Christian 'Ansuel' Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com> | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Some additional comments external to this patch. | ||
I tried to find different way to fix this... | ||
One of them would be mod the logic of the rhash and using as a key both | ||
the vlan_id and the addr but this is problematic for the function | ||
where ath11k_peer_find_by_addr is used as vlan_id is not always available. | ||
|
||
I honestly think a correct solution would be have a rhash list per vdev_id | ||
or per mac_id but again this is problematic for some function that just handles | ||
data and have only the addr as a way to identify the peer. | ||
|
||
So unless some change are done to the firmware to provide the vlan_id in the | ||
msdu data this to me seems to be the only solution to correctly handle this case. | ||
|
||
Another solution I tried was to add to the peer some additional info and put | ||
the rhash addition in the peer delete logic by passing the "to-be-added peer" to | ||
the peer to delete but I notice that it's unreliable since it can happent that | ||
the new peer hasn't been mapped at the time the peer delete is called. | ||
|
||
So this is really how to handle the rhash table in this corner case. | ||
Considering how peer are handled in theory it should never happen to have | ||
dangling peer that are not deleted. | ||
|
||
Hoping this is not too much of an hack and we find a good solution for this | ||
problem. | ||
|
||
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- | ||
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) | ||
|
||
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c | ||
index 9e22aaf34b88..1ae7af02c364 100644 | ||
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c | ||
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/peer.c | ||
@@ -302,6 +302,21 @@ static int __ath11k_peer_delete(struct ath11k *ar, u32 vdev_id, const u8 *addr) | ||
spin_lock_bh(&ab->base_lock); | ||
|
||
peer = ath11k_peer_find_by_addr(ab, addr); | ||
+ /* Check if the found peer is what we want to remove. | ||
+ * While the sta is transitioning to another band we may | ||
+ * have 2 peer with the same addr assigned to different | ||
+ * vdev_id. Make sure we are deleting the correct peer. | ||
+ */ | ||
+ if (peer && peer->vdev_id == vdev_id) | ||
+ ath11k_peer_rhash_delete(ab, peer); | ||
+ | ||
+ /* Fallback to peer list search if the correct peer can't be found. | ||
+ * Skip the deletion of the peer from the rhash since it has already | ||
+ * been deleted in peer add. | ||
+ */ | ||
+ if (!peer) | ||
+ peer = ath11k_peer_find(ab, vdev_id, addr); | ||
+ | ||
if (!peer) { | ||
spin_unlock_bh(&ab->base_lock); | ||
mutex_unlock(&ab->tbl_mtx_lock); | ||
@@ -312,8 +327,6 @@ static int __ath11k_peer_delete(struct ath11k *ar, u32 vdev_id, const u8 *addr) | ||
return -EINVAL; | ||
} | ||
|
||
- ath11k_peer_rhash_delete(ab, peer); | ||
- | ||
spin_unlock_bh(&ab->base_lock); | ||
mutex_unlock(&ab->tbl_mtx_lock); | ||
|
||
@@ -372,8 +385,17 @@ int ath11k_peer_create(struct ath11k *ar, struct ath11k_vif *arvif, | ||
spin_lock_bh(&ar->ab->base_lock); | ||
peer = ath11k_peer_find_by_addr(ar->ab, param->peer_addr); | ||
if (peer) { | ||
- spin_unlock_bh(&ar->ab->base_lock); | ||
- return -EINVAL; | ||
+ if (peer->vdev_id == param->vdev_id) { | ||
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ar->ab->base_lock); | ||
+ return -EINVAL; | ||
+ } | ||
+ | ||
+ /* Assume sta is transitioning to another band. | ||
+ * Remove here the peer from rhash. | ||
+ */ | ||
+ mutex_lock(&ar->ab->tbl_mtx_lock); | ||
+ ath11k_peer_rhash_delete(ar->ab, peer); | ||
+ mutex_unlock(&ar->ab->tbl_mtx_lock); | ||
} | ||
spin_unlock_bh(&ar->ab->base_lock); | ||
|