Java 程序员编写的类似 common-lang 工具包 包名就是要用大驼峰,不想改成 go 规范的包名。自己写的任性
Licenses for Open Source Development
go get github.com/sjsdfg/common-lang-in-go
- IsEmpty(str string) bool
- IsNotEmpty(str string) bool
- IsAllEmpty(list ...string) bool
- IsAnyEmpty(list ...string) bool
- IsAnyNoneEmpty(list ...string) bool
- IsBlank(str string) bool
- IsNotBlank(str string) bool
- IsZero(str string) bool
- IsNotZero(str string) bool
- IsAnyZero(list ...string) bool
- IsAllZero(list ...string) bool
- IsAnyNoneZero(list ...string) bool
- Equal(str1, str2 string) bool
- EqualIgnoreCase(str1, str2 string) bool
- EqualsAny(str string, list ...string) bool
- EqualsAnyIgnoreCase(str string, list ...string) bool
- IsDigital(str string) bool
- DefaultIfEmpty(str, defaultStr string) string
- If(condition bool, ifTrue, ifFalse string) string
- Truncate(str string, startIndex, endIndex int) string
- AllMatch(list interface{}, action matchFunc) bool
- AnyMatch(list interface{}, action matchFunc) bool
- NoneMatch(list interface{}, action matchFunc) bool
Use Case
func TestAllMatch(t *testing.T) {
testCase := []string{"a", "a", "a"}
assert.Equal(t, true, AllMatch(testCase, func(index int) bool {
return testCase[index] == "a"
}))
testCase = []string{"a", "a", "b"}
assert.Equal(t, false, AllMatch(testCase, func(index int) bool {
return testCase[index] == "a"
}))
}
func TestAnyMatch(t *testing.T) {
testCase := []string{"a", "a", "b"}
assert.Equal(t, true, AnyMatch(testCase, func(index int) bool {
return testCase[index] == "b"
}))
testCase = []string{"a", "a", "b"}
assert.Equal(t, false, AnyMatch(testCase, func(index int) bool {
return testCase[index] == "c"
}))
}
func TestNoneMatch(t *testing.T) {
testCase := []string{"a", "a", "b"}
assert.Equal(t, true, NoneMatch(testCase, func(index int) bool {
return testCase[index] == "c"
}))
testCase = []string{"a", "a", "b"}
assert.Equal(t, false, NoneMatch(testCase, func(index int) bool {
return testCase[index] == "b"
}))
}
- IsEmpty(collection interface{})
- IsNotEmpty(collection interface{}) bool
这个是由于没有 Java Stream 里面的 map,导致每次提取某一类型的字段成为数组,写的代码十分冗余。所以抽象出来的。
由于不支持泛型,只能书写基本类型的方法调用。不过我的个人场景就是提取某一个字段(尤其是 id),目前还够用。
- MapToStringSlice(list interface{}, action func(index int) string) []string
- MapToIntSlice(list interface{}, action func(index int) int) []int
- MapToInt64Slice(list interface{}, action func(index int) int64) []int64
- MapToFloat64Slice(list interface{}, action func(index int) float64) []float64
- MapToFloat32Slice(list interface{}, action func(index int) float32) []float32
Use Case
func TestMapToStringSlice(t *testing.T) {
students := createStudents()
timer := TimeUtils.NewTimer()
reflectSlice := MapToStringSlice(students, func(i int) string {
return students[i].name
})
t.Logf("MapToStringSlice cost %d nanos", timer.GetDurationInNanos())
timer.Reset()
nativeSlice := NativeMapToStringSlice(students)
t.Logf("NativeMapToStringSlice cost %d nanos", timer.GetDurationInNanos())
assert.Equal(t, nativeSlice, reflectSlice)
}
- ForEach(list interface{}, action func(index int)):之前写 Java 写惯了,觉得使用 return 代替 continue 是可读性更高的代码,因为可以提早返回减少代码的嵌套接口。因此抽象出了该方法
func TestForEach(t *testing.T) {
students := createStudents()
ForEach(students, func(index int) {
t.Log(students[index])
})
ForEach(students, func(index int) {
students[index].name = "testing"
})
ForEach(students, func(index int) {
assert.Equal(t, "testing", students[index].name)
})
}
以上方法类型为 FunctionName(list interface{}, action func(index int))
均可以替换为 FunctionName(len int, action func(index int))
比如 ForEach 的实现可以为
func ForEach(len int, action func(i int)) {
for i := 0; i < len; i++ {
action(i)
}
}
这个版本的运行效率更高。但是考虑到边界检查的安全性问题,我还是更倾向于传入 list 进来,通过反射来获取列表的长度。相关代码可查看 https://github.com/sjsdfg/common-lang-in-go/blob/faster/CollectionUtils/collection_utils.go
- Max(list ...float32) float32
- Min(list ...float32) float32
- If(condition bool, ifTrue, ifFalse float32) float32
- Abs(a float32) float32
- Equal(a, b float32) bool
- Max(list ...float64) float64
- Min(list ...float64) float64
- If(condition bool, ifTrue, ifFalse float64) float64
- Abs(a float64) float64
- Equal(a, b float64) bool
- Max(list ...int64) int64
- Min(list ...int64) int64
- If(condition bool, ifTrue, ifFalse int64) int64
- Abs(a int64) int64
- Max(list ...int) int
- Min(list ...int) int
- If(condition bool, ifTrue, ifFalse int64) int
- Abs(a int) int
- Max(list ...time.Time) time.Time
- Min(list ...time.Time) time.Time
- If(condition bool, ifTrue, ifFalse int64) time.Time
上面的 XxxUtils
根据类型进行抽象,提供了最大值最小值的方法。并且因为 go 语言没有提供三目表达式,提供了 If
方法出来。可以边写出来可读性更高的代码
// 待实现 主要是想配合 IDEA 的 live template 和 Postfix completion 进行快捷键的搭配。
这样可以更好的使用该库。
goos: darwin
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/sjsdfg/common-lang-in-go/CollectionUtils
BenchmarkIsEmpty 22247214 54.3 ns/op
BenchmarkIsEmpty-2 23466332 51.7 ns/op
BenchmarkIsEmpty-4 23064122 51.4 ns/op
BenchmarkIsEmpty-8 23634132 51.5 ns/op
BenchmarkNativeIsEmpty
BenchmarkNativeIsEmpty 20717202 53.7 ns/op
BenchmarkNativeIsEmpty-2 23106975 50.9 ns/op
BenchmarkNativeIsEmpty-4 22869487 51.1 ns/op
BenchmarkNativeIsEmpty-8 23977856 51.1 ns/op
PASS
BenchmarkMapToStringSlice
BenchmarkMapToStringSlice 4942840 292 ns/op
BenchmarkMapToStringSlice-2 4770552 263 ns/op
BenchmarkMapToStringSlice-4 4740819 302 ns/op
BenchmarkMapToStringSlice-8 5007906 238 ns/op
BenchmarkNativeMapToStringSlice
BenchmarkNativeMapToStringSlice 10728244 113 ns/op
BenchmarkNativeMapToStringSlice-2 10394302 113 ns/op
BenchmarkNativeMapToStringSlice-4 10965626 112 ns/op
BenchmarkNativeMapToStringSlice-8 10831770 113 ns/op
PASS