Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Don't proceed with type_union_implicit if no validation vocabulary #234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

Don't proceed with type_union_implicit if no validation vocabulary #234

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 7 additions & 2 deletions src/linter/implicit/type_union_implicit.h
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -21,8 +21,13 @@ class TypeUnionImplicit final : public sourcemeta::alterschema::Rule {
"http://json-schema.org/draft-03/schema#",
"http://json-schema.org/draft-02/hyper-schema#",
"http://json-schema.org/draft-01/hyper-schema#",
"http://json-schema.org/draft-00/hyper-schema#"}) &&
schema.defines("type")) {
"http://json-schema.org/draft-00/hyper-schema#"})) {
if (schema.defines("type")) {
return false;
}

// Don't apply if we don't have the necessary vocabularies
} else {
return false;
}

Expand Down