-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add SupportRelationship #728
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Josh. This matches what was discussed in the call earlier.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One suggestion to consider
|
||
## Summary | ||
|
||
Describes how an Agent Provides Support for an Element |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we have the "to" of the relationship be an Artifact
rather than an Element
? It would seem that only artifacts would be something that would require support.
Thanks @JPEWdev for creating the PR. |
Adds a new SupportRelationship that uses a derived Relationship to indicate support, since this allows associating the support with a specific entity. Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <JPEWhacker@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <arthit@gmail.com>
Adds a new SupportRelationship that uses a derived Relationship to indicate support, since this allows associating the support with a specific entity.