rstantools v2.4.0

[jgabry]

Getting ready for the next release.

[jgabry]

@andrjohns I'll run reverse dependency checks locally and if those pass and so do all the checks for this PR then I'll go ahead and submit to CRAN.

[jgabry]

@andrjohns Do you by any chance have any time to help look into these multiple GHA failures? I've got a ton to catch up on after being away for a while so it might take me some time to get to this.

[andrjohns]

@andrjohns Do you by any chance have any time to help look into these multiple GHA failures? I've got a ton to catch up on after being away for a while so it might take me some time to get to this.

Perfect timing! I'm waiting for some other stuff to finish running, so I can have a look now

[jgabry]

Awesome, thanks! I'm also running reverse dependency checks locally and so far the first 15 packages have passed, but there are 128 total, so a while to go still. I also checked on win-builder and that was ok too.

[jgabry]

@andrjohns A few things:

1. Looks like your commit fixed the Stanfunctions support checks (thanks!), but there's still a failure on Ubuntu with R-devel. It looks like it's erroring in the vignette, but I tried to reproduce the error and I haven't been able to. Any ideas? If not I can try to do some more digging.

2. I ran reverse dependency checks on the 100+ packages that use rstantools and they all passed, so we're good to go other than the weird vignette/Ubuntu failure.

[andrjohns]

2. I ran reverse dependency checks on the 100+ packages that use rstantools and they all passed, so we're good to go other than the weird vignette/Ubuntu failure.

Yeww! Great to hear. I'm also having trouble replicating the Ubuntu devel failure, but I want to dig a little more. Could you try submitting to the win-builder devel and see if there's an error there too?

[andrjohns]

@jgabry figured it out. For some reason some of the example code in example(source) was throwing an error. But since that was only being called so that the sourceDir function was defined, we can instead just define that directly

[jgabry]

Awesome, thanks for figuring that out and fixing it

[jgabry]

I'll go ahead and submit to CRAN

[jgabry]

Submitted! I'll tag the release once it's accepted on CRAN.

[jgabry]

On CRAN now