chore(blockifier): rename EntryPointExecutionContext::new_invoke to n…

[meship-starkware]

…ew_execute.

---

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 62.98%. Comparing base (b0cfe82) to head (311da37).
Report is 151 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (b0cfe82) and HEAD (311da37). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (b0cfe82)	HEAD (311da37)
	3	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1092       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   74.18%   62.98%   -11.20%     
===========================================
  Files         359      125      -234     
  Lines       36240    15898    -20342     
  Branches    36240    15898    -20342     
===========================================
- Hits        26886    10014    -16872     
+ Misses       7220     5113     -2107     
+ Partials     2134      771     -1363     

Flag	Coverage Δ
	62.98% <100.00%> (-11.20%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[noaov1]

Reviewed 6 of 6 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @meship-starkware)

---

crates/blockifier/src/execution/entry_point.rs line 163 at r1 (raw file):

    }

    pub fn new_execution(

Just a suggestion :)

Suggestion:

    pub fn new_validate(
        tx_context: Arc<TransactionContext>,
        limit_steps_by_resources: bool,
    ) -> Self {
        Self::new(tx_context, ExecutionMode::Validate, limit_steps_by_resources)
    }

    pub fn new_execute(