style(blockifier): avoid repetition in Transaction variant names

[meship-starkware]

This change is 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 23.52941% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.77%. Comparing base (b0cfe82) to head (85d75e1).
Report is 149 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...lockifier/src/transaction/transaction_execution.rs	21.42%	10 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...es/blockifier/src/blockifier/stateful_validator.rs	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
crates/native_blockifier/src/py_transaction.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (b0cfe82) and HEAD (85d75e1). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (b0cfe82)	HEAD (85d75e1)
	3	1

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1106       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   74.18%   59.77%   -14.42%     
===========================================
  Files         359      141      -218     
  Lines       36240    16962    -19278     
  Branches    36240    16962    -19278     
===========================================
- Hits        26886    10139    -16747     
+ Misses       7220     6128     -1092     
+ Partials     2134      695     -1439     

Flag	Coverage Δ
	59.77% <23.52%> (-14.42%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[noaov1]

Reviewed 6 of 6 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @meship-starkware)