Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Only apply VID-only port property association to compatible dev tools #2517

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Sep 14, 2024

Summary

The Arduino boards platform framework allows properties of a port to be associated with a board definition. The Arduino development software will identify a port having the associated properties as that board.

The "Blues boards" board definition contains an association for the vid port property value of 0x30A4:

Blues.vid.0=0x30A4

Typically, in addition to the vid property, a companion pid property will also be associated so that the association is specific to devices with that VID/PID pair. However, this board definition only associates a vid property. Although unusual, this is reasonable in this case where the board definition provides support for all models of the Blues boards (rather than one specific model as is typically the case).

Unfortunately it seems that the Arduino IDE 1.x codebase is written in a way that assumes a PID association will always be provided along with a VID association. When a platform is installed that contains a board definition that associates a vid property without also associating a pid property, it breaks port discovery entirely, causing no ports to be discovered for any board.

The port discovery and port properties association system has been completely reworked since the time of Arduino IDE 1.x. The modern system, which is used by Arduino IDE 2.x and Arduino CLI, doesn't have any problem with this VID-only association. This means that it would be possible to define this association without breaking Arduino IDE 1.x if the association could be applied exclusively for the modern Arduino development software versions. Arduino IDE 1.x only uses the port property association for the convenience feature of labeling the port in the Tools > Port menu, so the lack of an association doesn't cause any meaningful impact.

At the time the port discovery and port properties association system was reworked, the port property association properties were renamed to support association with any arbitrary properties:

https://arduino.github.io/arduino-cli/latest/pluggable-discovery-specification/#board-identification

(while retaining support for the old property names). The new property names are only recognized by the modern Arduino development software and have no effect on Arduino IDE 1.x.

The port association properties for the "Blues boards" board definition are migrated from the old property names previously in use to the new names. This causes the port property association to no longer be recognized by Arduino IDE 1.x, fixing the breakage of its port discovery system. The association will still be recognized by the modern versions of Arduino development software just as before.


This PR fixes/implements the following bugs/features

Validation

  1. Install the version of the platform without this patch.
  2. Start Arduino IDE 1.8.19
  3. Connect any device to your computer that produces a serial port.
  4. Open the Tools menu in Arduino IDE.
    🐛 The Port menu item is grayed out, indicating no ports were discovered even though a port is present.
  5. Select File > Quit (or Arduino > Quit Arduino for macOS users) from the Arduino IDE menus.
  6. Apply the patch proposed here.
  7. Start Arduino IDE 1.8.19
  8. Select Tools > Port from the Arduino IDE menus.
    🙂 All serial ports are listed in the menu.
  9. Start Arduino IDE 2.3.2
  10. Connect a device that produces a port with VID of 0x30A4 to your computer.
  11. Select Tools > Port from the Arduino IDE menus.
    🙂 All serial ports are listed in the menu.
    🙂 The port of the device with VID of 0x30A4 is labeled "(Blues boards)

Additional context

Even though, from a technical standpoint, this change restores the platform's support for Arduino IDE 1.x, my impression is that maintainability was also a factor in the decision to drop 1.x support (which is quite understandable). For this reason, the "only Arduino IDE 2 is supported" statement was not removed from the readme.

Closing issues

The Arduino boards platform framework allows properties of a port to be
associated with a board definition. The Arduino development software
will identify a port having the associated properties as that board.

The "Blues boards" board definition contains an association for the vid
port property value of 0x30A4. Typically, in addition to the vid
property, a companion pid property will also be associated so that the
association is specific to devices with that VID/PID pair. However, this
board definition only associates a vid property. Although unusual, this
is reasonable in this case where the board definition provides support
for all models of the Blues boards (rather than one specific model as is
typically the case).

Unfortunately it seems that the Arduino IDE 1.x codebase is written in a
way that assumes a PID association will always be provided along with a
VID association. When a platform is installed that contains a board
definition that associates a vid property without also associating a pid
property, it breaks port discovery entirely, causing no ports to be
discovered for any board.

The port discovery and port properties association system has been
completely reworked since the time of Arduino IDE 1.x. The modern
system, which is used by Arduino IDE 2.x and Arduino CLI, doesn't have
any problem with this VID-only association. This means that it would be
possible to define this association without breaking Arduino IDE 1.x if
the association could be applied exclusively for the modern Arduino
development software versions. Arduino IDE 1.x only uses the port
property association for the convenience feature of labeling the port in
the "Port" menu, so the lack of an association doesn't cause any
meaningful impact.

At the time the port discovery and port properties association system
was reworked, the port property association properties were renamed to
support association with any arbitrary properties. (while retaining
support for the old property names). The new property names are only
recognized by the modern Arduino development software and have no effect
on Arduino IDE 1.x.

The port association properties for the "Blues boards" board definition
are migrated from the old property names previously in use to the new
names. This causes the port property association to no longer be
recognized by Arduino IDE 1.x, fixing the breakage of its port discovery
system. The association will still be recognized by the modern versions
of Arduino development software just as before.
@fpistm
Copy link
Member

fpistm commented Sep 16, 2024

Hi @per1234
Thanks for the PR.
Anyway, I'm not a big fan of adding the "upload_port" as a fix.
I've tested my proposal here and it works:
#2511 (comment)
It is more homogeneous to fix like that.
Are you agreed?

@per1234
Copy link
Contributor Author

per1234 commented Sep 16, 2024

I've tested my proposal here and it works:
#2511 (comment)

The only relevant part of that diff is this:

--- a/boards.txt
+++ b/boards.txt
@@ -12463,7 +12463,7 @@ Blues.build.st_extra_flags=-D{build.product_line} {build.enable_usb} {build.xSer
 Blues.build.flash_offset=0x0
 Blues.upload.maximum_size=0
 Blues.upload.maximum_data_size=0
-Blues.vid.0=0x30A4
 
 # Swan R5 board
 Blues.menu.pnum.SWAN_R5=Swan R5

The other changes might be worth making for other reasons, but they aren't relevant to #2469

That change will certainly fix #2469. However, assuming that providing identification for the ports of the Blues boards is considered desirable, it is clearly inferior to my proposal, which preserves the port identification for users of modern Arduino development software. You haven't provided any meaningful reason for rejecting my proposal.

@fpistm
Copy link
Member

fpistm commented Sep 16, 2024

In fact, no other boards have the "upload_port" property. That's why I told it is not homogeneous to use "upload_port".
If I had a chance I will develop a Discovery tool but no free time yet.

So to sum up, I used only this:
https://arduino.github.io/arduino-cli/1.0/platform-specification/#board-vidpid
Not upload_port.
Maybe it is a mistake I've made.
To be honest the description of the board vid/pid description and the upload_port is confusing and seems very closed.

fpistm added a commit to fpistm/Arduino_Core_STM32 that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
Supersede stm32duino#2517

Signed-off-by: Frederic Pillon <frederic.pillon@st.com>
fpistm added a commit to fpistm/Arduino_Core_STM32 that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
Supersede stm32duino#2517

Signed-off-by: Frederic Pillon <frederic.pillon@st.com>
@fpistm fpistm added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Sep 24, 2024
@fpistm
Copy link
Member

fpistm commented Sep 24, 2024

As no answer form OP, I've pushed a new PR (#2525) which supersede this one.
Discovery tools will be investigate later.

@fpistm fpistm closed this Sep 24, 2024
fpistm added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
Supersede #2517

Signed-off-by: Frederic Pillon <frederic.pillon@st.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Blues: wrong pid definition for Cygnet COM port under the Tools menu no longer appeared on V2.8
2 participants