-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 981
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only apply VID-only port property association to compatible dev tools #2517
Conversation
The Arduino boards platform framework allows properties of a port to be associated with a board definition. The Arduino development software will identify a port having the associated properties as that board. The "Blues boards" board definition contains an association for the vid port property value of 0x30A4. Typically, in addition to the vid property, a companion pid property will also be associated so that the association is specific to devices with that VID/PID pair. However, this board definition only associates a vid property. Although unusual, this is reasonable in this case where the board definition provides support for all models of the Blues boards (rather than one specific model as is typically the case). Unfortunately it seems that the Arduino IDE 1.x codebase is written in a way that assumes a PID association will always be provided along with a VID association. When a platform is installed that contains a board definition that associates a vid property without also associating a pid property, it breaks port discovery entirely, causing no ports to be discovered for any board. The port discovery and port properties association system has been completely reworked since the time of Arduino IDE 1.x. The modern system, which is used by Arduino IDE 2.x and Arduino CLI, doesn't have any problem with this VID-only association. This means that it would be possible to define this association without breaking Arduino IDE 1.x if the association could be applied exclusively for the modern Arduino development software versions. Arduino IDE 1.x only uses the port property association for the convenience feature of labeling the port in the "Port" menu, so the lack of an association doesn't cause any meaningful impact. At the time the port discovery and port properties association system was reworked, the port property association properties were renamed to support association with any arbitrary properties. (while retaining support for the old property names). The new property names are only recognized by the modern Arduino development software and have no effect on Arduino IDE 1.x. The port association properties for the "Blues boards" board definition are migrated from the old property names previously in use to the new names. This causes the port property association to no longer be recognized by Arduino IDE 1.x, fixing the breakage of its port discovery system. The association will still be recognized by the modern versions of Arduino development software just as before.
Hi @per1234 |
The only relevant part of that diff is this: --- a/boards.txt
+++ b/boards.txt
@@ -12463,7 +12463,7 @@ Blues.build.st_extra_flags=-D{build.product_line} {build.enable_usb} {build.xSer
Blues.build.flash_offset=0x0
Blues.upload.maximum_size=0
Blues.upload.maximum_data_size=0
-Blues.vid.0=0x30A4
# Swan R5 board
Blues.menu.pnum.SWAN_R5=Swan R5 The other changes might be worth making for other reasons, but they aren't relevant to #2469 That change will certainly fix #2469. However, assuming that providing identification for the ports of the Blues boards is considered desirable, it is clearly inferior to my proposal, which preserves the port identification for users of modern Arduino development software. You haven't provided any meaningful reason for rejecting my proposal. |
In fact, no other boards have the "upload_port" property. That's why I told it is not homogeneous to use "upload_port". So to sum up, I used only this: |
Supersede stm32duino#2517 Signed-off-by: Frederic Pillon <frederic.pillon@st.com>
Supersede stm32duino#2517 Signed-off-by: Frederic Pillon <frederic.pillon@st.com>
As no answer form OP, I've pushed a new PR (#2525) which supersede this one. |
Supersede #2517 Signed-off-by: Frederic Pillon <frederic.pillon@st.com>
Summary
The Arduino boards platform framework allows properties of a port to be associated with a board definition. The Arduino development software will identify a port having the associated properties as that board.
The "Blues boards" board definition contains an association for the
vid
port property value of0x30A4
:Arduino_Core_STM32/boards.txt
Line 12466 in 89a2951
Typically, in addition to the
vid
property, a companionpid
property will also be associated so that the association is specific to devices with that VID/PID pair. However, this board definition only associates avid
property. Although unusual, this is reasonable in this case where the board definition provides support for all models of the Blues boards (rather than one specific model as is typically the case).Unfortunately it seems that the Arduino IDE 1.x codebase is written in a way that assumes a PID association will always be provided along with a VID association. When a platform is installed that contains a board definition that associates a
vid
property without also associating apid
property, it breaks port discovery entirely, causing no ports to be discovered for any board.The port discovery and port properties association system has been completely reworked since the time of Arduino IDE 1.x. The modern system, which is used by Arduino IDE 2.x and Arduino CLI, doesn't have any problem with this VID-only association. This means that it would be possible to define this association without breaking Arduino IDE 1.x if the association could be applied exclusively for the modern Arduino development software versions. Arduino IDE 1.x only uses the port property association for the convenience feature of labeling the port in the Tools > Port menu, so the lack of an association doesn't cause any meaningful impact.
At the time the port discovery and port properties association system was reworked, the port property association properties were renamed to support association with any arbitrary properties:
https://arduino.github.io/arduino-cli/latest/pluggable-discovery-specification/#board-identification
(while retaining support for the old property names). The new property names are only recognized by the modern Arduino development software and have no effect on Arduino IDE 1.x.
The port association properties for the "Blues boards" board definition are migrated from the old property names previously in use to the new names. This causes the port property association to no longer be recognized by Arduino IDE 1.x, fixing the breakage of its port discovery system. The association will still be recognized by the modern versions of Arduino development software just as before.
This PR fixes/implements the following bugs/features
Validation
🐛 The Port menu item is grayed out, indicating no ports were discovered even though a port is present.
🙂 All serial ports are listed in the menu.
0x30A4
to your computer.🙂 All serial ports are listed in the menu.
🙂 The port of the device with VID of
0x30A4
is labeled "(Blues boards)Additional context
Even though, from a technical standpoint, this change restores the platform's support for Arduino IDE 1.x, my impression is that maintainability was also a factor in the decision to drop 1.x support (which is quite understandable). For this reason, the "only Arduino IDE 2 is supported" statement was not removed from the readme.
Closing issues