Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add FormatPlanningInputTask #530

Conversation

Levi-Armstrong
Copy link
Contributor

This will format a composite instruction such that the joint waypoint, state waypoint and cartesian waypoint seed all match the joint name order for the assigned manipulator.

@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong force-pushed the feature/format-planning-input-task branch 3 times, most recently from e101b0e to f7c50f6 Compare November 7, 2024 05:10
@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong force-pushed the feature/format-planning-input-task branch from f7c50f6 to 0068b7c Compare November 7, 2024 05:17
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.46%. Comparing base (e506727) to head (0068b7c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #530      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.50%   84.46%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         231      233       +2     
  Lines       15784    15840      +56     
==========================================
+ Hits        13338    13380      +42     
- Misses       2446     2460      +14     

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong merged commit e5f06eb into tesseract-robotics:master Nov 7, 2024
10 of 17 checks passed
@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong deleted the feature/format-planning-input-task branch November 7, 2024 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant