Author: Thomas Steiner (tomac@google.com, @tomayac)
Last updated: 2021-09-07
By "restricting input using preformatted input masks (telephone number, birthday, Social Security number), or even auto-correcting input by appending or removing unnecessary characters" [cf. Klimczak], input masking helps users enter information in forms more correctly, and existing data can be formatted adequately. Many implementations of input masking exist in user land, proving that there is a true need for this feature.
This proposal is to gauge interest in making input masking part of the language,
maybe as a new interface of Intl
. Here're some code snippets that show what
this could look like in practice:
-
Globally agreed-on input mask:
// 16 digits. new Intl.InputMask("credit-card-number").format("4012888888881881"); // "4012 8888 8888 1881" // 15 digits. new Intl.InputMask("credit-card-number").format("378282246310005"); // "3782 822463 10005"
-
Locale-aware input mask with customization options:
new Intl.InputMask("phone-number", { locale: "de-DE", countryCode: "leadingPlus", areaCode: "leadingZero", groupSize: 2, }).format("00494012345678"); // "+49 (0)40 12 34 56 78"
-
Fully custom input mask with a mask function:
new Intl.InputMask("custom", { maskFunction: (input) => input.toLowerCase().replaceAll(" ", ""), }).format("No Spaces No Uppercase"); // "nospacesnouppercase"
Work on a polyfill that implements this proposal has started in
tomayac/js-input-masking-polyfill.
You can see Intl.InputMask
in action in the
demo.
Making this part of the language would allow people to use this on the client and the server.
For example, a client-side implementation could use this as follows (note
that the type="tel"
of the <input>
does not mean the input value is
"automatically validated to a particular format before the
form can be submitted, because formats for telephone numbers vary so much around
the world" [cf.
MDN]):
<label for="phone">Enter your phone number:</label>
<input type="tel" id="phone" name="phone" />
const formatPhoneNumber = (value) => {
return new Intl.InputMask("phone-number", {
locale: "de-DE",
countryCode: "leadingPlus",
areaCode: "leadingZero",
groupSize: 2,
}).format(value);
};
document.querySelector("#phone").addEventListener("input", (e) => {
e.target.value = formatPhoneNumber(e.target.value);
});
For a server-side implementation, this could look as follows:
SELECT phone FROM users_legacy;
# Returns a mix of formats from a legacy dataset:
# 00494012345678\n+494012345678\n04012345678
const formatPhoneNumber = (value) => {
return new Intl.InputMask("phone-number", {
locale: "de-DE",
countryCode: "leadingPlus",
areaCode: "leadingZero",
groupSize: 2,
}).format(value);
};
// Express.js YOLO example.
app.get("/phones", (req, res) => {
const rawPhones = getPhoneNumbersFromLegacyDB();
const formattedPhonesHTML = rawPhones
.map((rawPhone) => {
return formatPhoneNumber(rawPhone);
})
.join("<br>");
res.send(formattedPhonesHTML);
});
Just leaving this to the user land is an obvious alternative. The ecosystem of input masking libraries is alive, and great implementations exist. Pulling any of those in comes at a cost for each locale that's needed though, and the weight of the particular input masking library itself.
Another alternative would be to add new (and smarter) input types. A recent
example is the
input[type=currency]
proposal. The declarative burden for advanced formatting needs is not to be
underestimated, though (see the above countryCode
and areaCode
examples).
This also does not solve the issue on the server side.
Feedback on this early-stage idea is welcome. Please open a new Issue.
I'm thankful for the contributions from: