Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove non working link #1738

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2023
Merged

Remove non working link #1738

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 2 additions & 5 deletions CONTRIBUTING.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -62,11 +62,8 @@ demonstrate that your fix was needed.

Reek uses [Rspec](http://rspec.info/) for unit and functional testing.

We're trying to follow [betterspecs](http://betterspecs.org/). We're not using
RSpec's
[shared examples](https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/docs/example-groups/shared-examples)
because we find them rather harming than helpful. You can find an excellent
cheat sheet on how to write idiomatic Rspec
We're trying to follow [betterspecs](http://betterspecs.org/).
You can find an excellent cheat sheet on how to write idiomatic Rspec
[here](http://www.rubypigeon.com/posts/rspec-core-cheat-sheet).

We do not use the popular "foo" / "bar" naming when it comes to the question
Expand Down