-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cif 197 core resolution option for layer downloads #68
Cif 197 core resolution option for layer downloads #68
Conversation
…test_layer_parameters in a manner intended to improve ease of code maintenance.
I implemented the test_layer_parameters test in a manner that will simplify addition of other layer classes in the future. This solution follows the goal of making CIF as self-maintainable as possible by data scientists. |
…ttps://github.com/wri/cities-cif into CIF-197-CORE-Resolution-option-for-layer-downloads
Change summary:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor suggestion for additional tests but otherwise looks good!
@jterry64 - In particular, could you carefully review the spatial_resolution implementation in HighLandSurfaceTemperature? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this is merged but had a couple questions...
Attributes: | ||
start_date: starting date for data retrieval | ||
end_date: ending date for data retrieval | ||
spatial_resolution: raster resolution in meters (see https://github.com/stac-extensions/raster) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there a reason you added (see https://github.com/stac-extensions/raster)
to all of theses and not just the ones that use a stac catalog?
@@ -16,5 +16,6 @@ geemap==0.32.0 | |||
pip==23.3.1 | |||
boto3==1.34.124 | |||
scikit-learn==1.5.1 | |||
scikit-image==0.24.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What are we using scikit-image
for?
Is this PR related to a JIRA ticket?
https://gfw.atlassian.net/browse/CIF-197
What changes were proposed in this PR?
Allow control of spatial resolution of raster layers.
How was this patch tested?
Locally on MS WSL
Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?