Is the dataset reviewer fully functional?

[miguelriemoliveira]

Hi @danifpdra ,

Me, @manuelgitgomes and @DanielCoelho112 worked on the dataset reviewer in the last days.

I think now we have a fully functional solution, but I wanted you to tell us if something is missing.

List of related issues (Please edit and add if any is missing).

• Print a list of keys than the user can use #396
• Manual annotation of rgb images #394
• Is it really necessary to define the buff_size? #393
• Depth labellings displacement when calibrating #391
• View pattern with smaller images #384
• Creating an image display rviz plugin with clicking functionality #378
• inconsistencies in lidar 3d labelling in real data #377
• Dataset reviewer - Depth modality #374
• Add text to each sensor's interactive marker #372
• Create an eraser functionality that allows the user to click to erase some boundary points in the depth modality #399
• Calibration visualization markers with all the namespaces #398
• Segmentation fault when selecting many points in rviz #403
• Separate displays per sensor in calibrate #404
• Separate displays per sensor in dataset_playback #407

[manuelgitgomes]

That's great, congrats to all! I will test this ASAP.

[miguelriemoliveira]

Closing this one. Both opened issues are defined as low priority.