-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Istio sample update #76
Istio sample update #76
Conversation
This commit merges a script that will deploy Model-Registry with ODH then runs a rest api to conclude the script. It intended for use with Openshift-CI. Signed-off-by: tonyxrmdavidson <tonyxrmdavidson@yahoo.co.uk>
This commit reverts the script to deply basic model-registry back to it's original. Changes here are needed. Signed-off-by: tonyxrmdavidson <tonyxrmdavidson@yahoo.co.uk>
This commit reverts to the original file format as specifying opendatahub version is not required Signed-off-by: tonyxrmdavidson <tonyxrmdavidson@yahoo.co.uk>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: tonyxrmdavidson The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/test e2e-odh-mro-optional |
/retest |
This commit introduces istio-tls- rest.sh script which is specific to the istio-tls deployment It adds the certs/ to gitignore It makes changes to the oci-model-registry-istio-tls-deploy.sh script to point to the correct rest.sh Signed-off-by: tonyxrmdavidson <tonyxrmdavidson@yahoo.co.uk>
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
This commit is to allow the PR to pass the codcov tests Signed-off-by: tonyxrmdavidson <tonyxrmdavidson@yahoo.co.uk>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #76 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 75.84% 75.84%
=======================================
Files 19 19
Lines 2215 2215
Branches 101 101
=======================================
Hits 1680 1680
Misses 340 340
Partials 195 195 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
One comment however, and I might have missed something, but looks to me we are keeping a copy of the Manifests from the ODH/model-registry-operator, here; since the original inception of that, now this copy:
- evolves: the more manifest in MRO repo, the more we copy over here
- keep the need of manual sync
I'm not arguing for an immediate action here, but as we're considering "shifting left" and "lefter", it could be interesting to evaluate:
- for the script here in midstream to just consume the manifest from the odh/MRO repo
- as that might as well make it easier to parametrize to consume different manifests, for instance, just consume KF/mr manifest and skip the use of ODH/MRO when testing this for upstream (and other applicable limitations)
wdyt ?
b97384a
into
opendatahub-io:main
wdyt ? I waiting to see who will bring this point up. Thanks @tarilabs ++. Very valid point in terms manageability of the code. How does the manifests project link up in the Kubeflow repos or between ODH operator and MRO mainifests? |
This PR will allow the deployment of model-registry-istio-tls in the PROW/openshift job.
The deployment files for this deployment are directly copied over from the model-registry-operator file. Some the files will be unused at the moment but will likely be needed to give us the option to switch the PROW/openshift-ci job to use the any of the samples available in for PR checking.
How was this tested
It was tested by running locally targeting an already deployed openshift cluster and was oc logged in.
How to run the script and test the PR.