babeld: update to 1.13 #992
Conversation
Announcement: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/babel-users/2023-July/004100.html Babeld removed diversity routing [0], so we need to adjust ubus bindings. Further. we need to add a patch that makes local_kind accessible again: "100-local-make-local_kind-function-accessible.patch" Refresh patches: - 600-add-ubus.patch [0] - jech/babeld@a081608 Signed-off-by: Nick Hainke <vincent@systemli.org>
|
You merged that within 40 minutes around midnight, in that time, trust me, no one will look at it. :-( |
| From b29cb705c3b717a7d5c61719936464438b9a48f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | ||
| From: Nick Hainke <vincent@systemli.org> | ||
| Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:01:31 +0100 | ||
| Subject: [PATCH] local: make local_kind function accessible |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Further. we need to add a patch that makes local_kind accessible again: "100-local-make-local_kind-function-accessible.patch"
Why do we need this patch? Did you try to send it to upstream?
It looks like to me without further looking into it that you are changing something that is not exactly wanted by upstream. They did it on purpose, didnt they?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, I see that it is right now included in that repository, but you did not describe it anyhow in the OP. So, yes, it is better to include it instead of blindly adding patches, otherwise, the reviewer needs to spend more time if it is included in the upstream or it isnt. What I only found was this PR jech/babeld#72 2 years ago.
Announcement:
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/babel-users/2023-July/004100.html
Babeld removed diversity routing [0], so we need to adjust ubus bindings. Further. we need to add a patch that makes local_kind accessible again: "100-local-make-local_kind-function-accessible.patch"
Refresh patches:
[0] - jech/babeld@a081608
Maintainer: me
Compile tested: mt7621, mt7622
Run tested: mt7622